[wagglebee]

My premise is that there are limited resources and, as such, difficult choices have to be made.

I understand that this is your premise, it is the same premise that has always been used to promote death panels. But the reality is that you have yet to demonstrate that it is valid.

You are the one muddying these waters.

By asking for proof? Who would you rather be when you grow up: Pelosi, Hillary or Obama?

You muddy it even more by injecting religion into it.

Actually, YOU brought it up in post #81 when you wrote:
"the injection of religion into this debate tells me more than I need to know about all of you."

All Brian had done was talk about a Catholic priest who was dehydrated to death, NOTHING would have changed if he had been an atheist.

The only time I mentioned religion was when you asked what I thought God's will was and I later remarked that the culture of death always blames Christians for getting in their way.

[trisham]

Who would you rather be when you grow up: Pelosi, Hillary or Obama?

********************

I wonder how long before you receive a response to that one, wagglebee. Choosing between the three may be difficult for our RN friend.

[floriduh voter]

Conception to natural death. This doesn’t necessarily mean millions of dollars change hands! The money argument is simply a red herring - the fog of war between the death cultists and the actual faith based people.