He actually changed the subject instead of defending the rights of property owners
No, he actually RESPONDED to the fact that the media had already changed the subject themselves and inferred that he wanted to overturn the Civil Rights act of 1964, when all he had done was defend the rights of property owners against the overreaching parts of this act. He was reasonable and straightforward with Maddow, and had just had enough by the time he sat down with Stephanopolous. He is articulate when he is being instructive, and he is articulate when he is taking scalps. He was taking scalps yesterday morning.