Replies

To: GeronL; Jim Robinson

It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any alien who is in the United States in violation of law. HARBORING MEANS ANY CONDUCT THAT TENDS TO SUBSTANTIALLY FACILITATE AN ALIEN TO REMAIN IN THE U.S. ILLEGALLY. .The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his legal status.

Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A): A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

The POTUS IS A FELON!

354 posted on 05/21/2010 4:32:10 PM PDT by bigheadfred (If I've said it once, I've said it a million times...)

355 posted on 05/21/2010 4:35:06 PM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)

366 posted on 05/21/2010 5:35:27 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)

375 posted on 05/21/2010 6:39:35 PM PDT by bigheadfred (If I've said it once, I've said it a million times...)

382 posted on 05/21/2010 6:50:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)

The POTUS IS A FELON!

Actually, this is a legally significant point. The Founding Fathers reasonable claims of tyranny by King George were used to legitimize the break with Great Britain. This was a legal principle used by the Dutch revolutionaries against 16th Century Spain. However the Dutch had made a stretch to the law, in that if your Sovereign had committed a FELONY against you, all oaths and homage were null and void. You could go so far as to legally engage in war against you former Sovereign, if you so chose.

The less extreme option of packing up and finding another Liege Lord willing to protect you obviously follows.

Please see T. Beza's monograph "Des Droits du Magistrats sur lieur Sujets" of circa 1574 (french is approximate). In it, Beza references the exact law in the libri feudorum on the legal consequences of felonious activity against you by the government you had owed loyalty to.

393 posted on 05/21/2010 8:15:25 PM PDT by magooey (then - NO JUSTICE! NO PEACE!, now - NO DATA! NO WARMING!)

Yes indeed, while I am no constitutional or criminal lawyer, on the face of it, this is Impeachable.

I have been furiously studying tonight wherever I can, both from the FEDERAL and ARIZONA LAW positions, the situation of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. The U.S Justice Department and the President, if he specifically ordered it as they have threatened, in the State of Arizona as a retaliation against Arizona Law, to defacto impede or ignore federal crimes brought to their attention, would in fact be guilty of the Felony of "Obstruction of Justice", which justifies an Article of Impeachment from the House Judiciary Committee (or from any member that fact), brought to the Full House, against the President of the United States.

423 posted on 05/22/2010 8:32:16 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (If we allow them to ISOLATE & "SAUL ALINSKY" poor Arizona--and we lose, that's it folks. It's OVER.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794