Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biggirl

“Did not a federal court judge ruled that “net nutrality” to be illegal?”

They just changed definitions to avoid the SCOTUS. With the same results though.


5 posted on 05/21/2010 4:03:55 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (To argue witha person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: vanilla swirl

A bit like DC keeps changing their gun laws after the Supreme Court ruled the old one illegal. They can pass regulations faster then the Supreme Court can rule on them.


12 posted on 05/21/2010 4:20:52 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson