Britain to seek 'new special relationship' with India

LONDON: Britain's new coalition government on Thursday committed itself to forge a 'new special relationship' with India, an objective Prime Minister David Cameron had articulated as early as 2006 during his visit to New Delhi as the Conservative leader.

The full text of the coalition agreement published on Thursday says: "We will work to establish a new 'special relationship' with India and seek closer engagement with China, while standing firm on human rights in all our bilateral relationships".

It says: "We support reform of the UN Security Council, including permanent seats for Japan, India, Germany, Brazil and African representation".

Cameron, who made his first overseas visit as leader of the Conservative party to India in 2006, has been in close touch with the Indian community often addressing public meetings of Indian spiritual leader Morari Bapu.

Writing in The Guardian after his visit to New Delhi, Cameron wrote: "For most of the past half century we in the west have assumed that we set the pace and we set the global agenda. Well now we must wake up to a new reality. We have to share global leadership with India, and with China".

"And we must recognise that India has established beyond argument, through its economic and political success, its right to a seat at the top table. India, one of the great civilisations of the world, is truly great again".

He added: "Our special relationship with America has been forged through a shared past and a shared understanding of the world. And now, in the 21st century, as the world's centre of gravity moves from Europe and the Atlantic to the south and the east, I believe it is time for Britain and India to forge a new special relationship, to meet our shared challenges in this new era of international affairs".

David Cameron won't rock UK-India boat

http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_david-cameron-won-t-rock-uk-india-boat_1383910

New Delhi: The new David Cameron-led coalition government in London is not expected to change the UK’s overall India policy.

Interests of the two countries are by now so entrenched that no government in either capital would like to rock the boat of a well-defined mature relationship.

“There is a convergence of interest between the two countries and no government wants to dismantle what has been built over the years. Ties between the two countries can only grow stronger,” a senior official in the ministry of external affairs (MEA) said.

The ties are not just people-to-people, but also business and education. India is the second largest investor in Britain, while UK is the fourth in India. There are 500 Indian companies in Britain. Half of them are in London and they generate roughly $23 billion (Rs1.15 lakh crore) worth of business there.

UK investments in India amounts to around $5.596 billion (Rs20,980 crore). With this kind of business ties and massive people-to-people contacts, the stakes on both sides are high. Prime minister David Cameron has already said that he wants special relations with India.

Britain’s new foreign secretary William Hague knows India well. In fact, he spent his honeymoon here. However, with British forces fighting in Afghanistan, Af-Pak will be the most important agenda on the UK’s foreign policy.

Hague’s approach to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan will be no different from Labour’s. The emphasis will continue to be on the engagement between India and Pakistan to allow Islamabad’s military to concentrate on Afghanistan. In a major foreign policy speech recently, Hague did the usual balancing act between India and Pakistan.

He said while Britain wants a “special relationship” with India, it also favoured massive support for democracy and stability in Pakistan. How all this pans out is yet to be seen. But as former ambassador to Washington Naresh Chandra says: “On Afghanistan, Britain with its long association with South Asia is a key player. The Americans often turn to UK for inputs.”

At the London meet on Afghanistan, Indian officials privately admitted that the UK played an important part in ensuring that New Delhi’s concerns about extending an olive branch to the moderate Taliban were not taken seriously. Though officially nothing was ever formally said, the feeling persisted.

Ironically, India has always been easy with a conservative set up in both UK and US. The Labour party, like the Democrats in the US, is much more intrusive than the Conservatives in the UK or the Republicans in America.

So, Kashmir had, in the past, been high on the agenda of successive Labour governments in Britain.

While there were no major problems between India and the UK during Gordon Brown’s tenure, former foreign minister David Miliband had angered South Block with his uncalled for remarks on Kashmir.

Days before an official visit to India in 2009, the 43-year-old foreign minister wrote a major piece in a British newspaper where he linked the Mumbai terror attack to the long-running dispute over Kashmir. India blames Lashkar-e-Taiba for the attack.

“Resolution of the dispute over Kashmir would help deny extremists in the region one of their main calls to arms and allow Pakistani authorities to focus more effectively on tackling the threat on their western borders,” Miliband wrote.

Ironically, Milband was in India to express his government’s solidarity with the people of India after the November 26, 2008 attack. Indian officials were furious. They were riled by the minister’s body language and aggressive manner at meetings with Manmohan Singh and foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee.

New Delhi is hoping that the new government does not rock the boat and will understand Indian concerns about terrorism better than Miliband.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.