Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe

Yah, I know. What I’m saying is that it would take probably the entire output of straw in the U.S. to cover any meaningful percentage of the many hundreds of square miles of ocean that has oil in it. The mere task of spreading that much straw (or hay) over that much ocean is a seriouly non-trivial problem. Much less the problem of picking it all up again.

Lots of things that sound easy, aren’t.


31 posted on 05/19/2010 11:16:47 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius

No doubt it would not be easy. The question is one of if it would be worth it. The priorities, imho are to stop the well/recover the oil being produced while that is being done, and to protect the coastal wetlands. Screw the beaches (I know that won’t be popular) but it is the marshes which are the spawning and feeding grounds for wildlife, including much of the commercial fisheries. The beaches will recover more quickly.


32 posted on 05/19/2010 11:35:36 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson