Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sten

If they regulate blogging, it’s as bad as demanding guns be turned in. If they move, the blogging continues in utter defiance of the law. Then THEY either ignore it or try to enforce their new law.

If they come to enforce, (Concord, Boston,,) we do not seek or start any violence, we only demand they desist. If they try to arrest or enforce, we defend by any means.

I feel that is perfectly moral and linear. No man has a right to regulate what an individual writes about politics and spreads as widely as he can.


16 posted on 05/19/2010 1:23:24 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

My guess is that they’ll use the ISP’s to police the content. They’ll scan for combinations of words and/or key words. They’ll then pull the plug on anything objectionable. (A SPAM filter works similarly.) They’ll enforce it by making it simply unavailable.

What we might do is develop really sophisticated email programs. We’ll send articles via email. Or, perhaps we’ll be able to use the phone system to text small stuff. (Obama-shirts raiding south Tampa today. Convoy to take arrestees to Stark Federal Reeducation Facility on Thursday.)


31 posted on 05/19/2010 2:36:39 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson