A non-viable fetus that is a serious health risk to the mother?
Hardly a blank check for abortion on demand.
But please feel free to continue to misrepresent the facts.
Like I said, his words are right there for all to see.
But, feel free to explain just what made these births a “non-viable fetus that is a serious health risk to the mother”
Isn’t that pretty much what has been said about the Zero’s position on partial birth abortion where the premature fetus was allowed to languish for some 45 minutes until it finally expired?
And, if you really wish to back up Paul’s stand, why not supply statistical evidence of just how many partial birth abortions fall into this category of “non-viable fetus that is a serious health risk to the mother?”