To: EternalVigilance
If you don't believe in protecting the God-given unalienable right to life of every single person in this country, how are you any different than them? I am for protecting the Right of all individuals. I also believe in following the process instead of shoe-horning in definitions willy-nilly.
It isn't a living document. Amend the language, don't change the meaning.
67 posted on
05/19/2010 1:23:28 PM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(III, Alarm and Muster)
To: Dead Corpse
I am for protecting the Right of all individuals. No, you're not. You're defending the Paul position, which is that states' "rights" are superior to individual unalienable rights.
Not very well, but you're trying.
68 posted on
05/19/2010 1:29:08 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(There is no right to do wrong. Those who claim there is destroy the foundations of true liberty.)
To: Dead Corpse
It isn't a living document. Amend the language, don't change the meaning. Pray tell what is at all amorphous about this language:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
69 posted on
05/19/2010 1:31:48 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(There is no right to do wrong. Those who claim there is destroy the foundations of true liberty.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson