[SoConPubbie]

No, sorry, but you do have to take her endorsements as a whole. Don’t try to minimize them - we are not ignorant of her endorsements! Just give us the facts, both good and bad. We really don’t need another CNN on FreeRepublic.

Well, you got them, so you should be happy now.

However, like most anti-Palin posters, you over-emphasize the negative, in order to ignore the postive.

So tell the rest of us the number of positive positions she holds on the issues vs. those she is weak on.

And again, how many good endorsements did she have vs. the 2 that were bad?

[Deagle]

I am NOT anti-Palin - actually PRO-Palin. I have just been disappointed in some of her endorsements. You should understand that if you look at the whole picture.

I actually support her but have been a bit disenchanted with her selections (political). Instead of going by her (at least I think) beliefs, she took the political low road.

That makes her a bit less in my opinion - my opinion only. That does not mean that I don’t support her or wish her well.
I would still vote for her in almost all circumstances...

I really don’t look much to political figures as far as my vote goes...but I do look for conservative people.