Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

“Capture the imagination” is always, always, always used in a positive light, to mean that the imagination has been engendered by an inspirational act of some sort.

For using the term the way Obama has, he should apologize to every American and every ally, and every family member of an American or an ally who has been murdered by these savages.

The problem with that is that, even if he could be convinced to apologize, it would never be a sincere apology for what he said.


66 posted on 05/18/2010 12:15:36 PM PDT by savedbygrace (Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace
Well, I did google the definition of the phrase and several used it as “to attract and hold the attention of”. I suppose if taken in that context, it could be used, but the usual connotation is to “inspire the imagination — to cause to dream of high adventure or great accomplishment” or in the case of an athletic or dramatic performance, it holds the audience's attention in a positive way.

Most everybody on the thread is right — the tape left NOTHING to the imagination and all I felt is horror and sadness for a beautiful young woman and his parents. Such a handsome young man — such sadistic criminals. Obama’s turn of phrase just wouldn't have occurred to me.

86 posted on 05/18/2010 12:29:41 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace
“Capture the imagination” is always, always, always used in a positive light, to mean that the imagination has been engendered by an inspirational act of some sort.

Yes, it is.

And Obama's use of this phrase can mean either, in the best case scenario, that he is wholly emotionally disconnected as a human being, and is robotically trying to come up with platitutes to fit various situations, or it can mean, in the worst case scenario, that he identifies with Pearl's killers and that his use of a positive word is, indeed, a true Freudian slip.

There is NO save for him here. If he really did a malaprop, like his Veep Biden, he would have IMMEDIATELY corrected himself over-the-top so as not to offend, as in "Whoa, what am I saying here??" so as not to be thought cruel and heartless. He did not do that. He doesn't give a hoot either way (in my two above scenarios).

104 posted on 05/18/2010 1:00:20 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson