The fact that this woman is peddled as the token "Conservative", is ludicrous.
If I were a female I could go butch for her...lol
This fool has been falsely promoting herself as the “Right” for a long time....she cannot even argue a point without getting confused. She has never been able to hold up the farce very well.
A few weeks ago she slipped up and criticized Palin for using “targeted” districts on her election map.
Maybe the show has decided to end the charade?
Where’s the “I wish *these* were brains!” picture?
My bet is most conservatives could care less about homosexual unions/marries save that with the Government involved, the most depraved receive special treatment. Erase that "protection", the issue goes away.
Oh, and quit falling into their "new speak" crap. They are not "gay", they are homosexuals and they hide behind the "gay" moniker. Government (even Conservatives) are complicit in painting a "happy fun time" by using "new speak".
She’s simply yet another woman who believes that she feels she knows what’s best for everyone, emphasis on “feels”.
Hasselbeck is being so naive. To equate “love” with sexual lust? To adopt Marxist language that is an oxymoron: gay marriage? What is that? That concept is bizarre and destructive to civil societies which want to create a future for their children.
There is a natural reason to unite one man and one woman and any other definition of marriage is obscene and will make the word meaningless. Christianity’s definition of marriage has made the most profound and successful societies on earth. Undermining Christian philosophy (Marxism) only creates moral morass because you destroy human dignity and human worth—such as the importance of sex in relationships for the sake of children and a future.
Does she not love her children? Does she understand that true love has nothing to do with sexual urges and sexual lust? Does she think that love means you have to have sex with someone to truly love them? What an idiot.
She is reducing the most profound human feeling into selfish, nihilistic, lust-filled sexual acts which all homosexual practice does. It reduces sex to a commodity...makes sex meaningless.
Think of what kind of Marxist, atheistic world you are trying to create for your children. Read the “Brave New World” and that is what you will get with this ugly, repulsive camel’s nose. We are talking about creating a society with absolutely NO human dignity and no freedom of religion.
Exempting Christian sexual morality from humanity puts us right back into the orgies of “pagan” Rome where homosexuality was practiced and condoned for centuries and where children were sacrificed to the gods. Come on, Hasselbeck, we can not reduce ourselves to a society who is only interested in pleasuring oneself. It will always destroy the society in the end.
Just polishing her liberal credentials to save her job.
When we stop giving celebs mindless rantings meaningful consideration, they will finally shut up.
When you spend so much time with liberal harpies, some of it is bound to rub off on you. She’s obviously suffering from the Joe Scarborough disease.
I have clue why people pay attention to these yentas.
The View: the one show on TV that you can actually feel IQ points drop as you watch it!
That sounds like a nightmare. Just sayin...
She leaves, we’re told McCain’s daughter is um, like going to take her place, but Hasselbeck is sitting in her chair once again. This time ‘round, however, she seems to be espousing the lefty ideals of her naggy cohorts, I don’t see any *strong, conservative, upholding America* comments. Just another go-along in order to get-along TV personality.
I don’t have an issue if someone is “gay” and wants a CIVIL Union, but the problem is, they want to force marriage. Let them have their CIVIL UNION. They can experience all the fun of divorce court and the marriage tax penalty.
Nice to look at, but not a deep thinker.
and tell them that traditional marriage is an institution ordained by God, and abandoning it would be disobeying God and harmful to society in the long run.
Hey Elizabeth, STFU!
First and foremost, conservatives believe that the voters in each state should be allowed to determine for that state how their marriage laws should be structured, and that no state can subject its marriage laws upon another state. How is that construed as ‘hate’?
Who cares what this dumb RINO bitch has to say?
If this society would simply stop looking to the government to regulate and define marriage AT ALL, this issue would die the death it so richly deserves.