Could Rand Paul Be The Next Ronald Reagan?

May 15, 2010 | Pinochet

[pinochet]

There is nothing that the political establishment fears more, than an honest conservative who cannot be bought. If a true conservative patriot is elected, who owes nothing to the big corporations or special interest groups, he can cut the federal budget by as much as 60 percent. The corrupt establishment that controls both parties would do everything to prevent that, because there is too much money at stake. The evil globalist establishment that controls America, has a tighter grip on American politics, than the mullahs have on the Iranian people.

[Texas Fossil]

No.

[rockinqsranch]

No

[DarthVader]

Not in 1 million years.

[MontaniSemperLiberi]

“The present day conservative politicians are good at rhetoric, but once they get elected, they sell out to the....”

They sold out looooong before they were elected. The campaign consultants spend a bit of time teaching them what to say and how to say it. The candidates learn that what they learned is effective and then go find money to pay for for more campaign consultant work, and on, and on and on.

[OldDeckHand]

Do you think Rand Paul would have the courage or the political philosophy to compel him to tell Mr. Gorbachev to "Tear down this wall"?

Yeah, I don't either. Paul, like his father, would say that it's none of our business. So NO, Rand Paul is NOT the next Ronald Reagan.

[hedgetrimmer]

Meaning he won’t sell out to the free traitors.

[hosepipe]

Rand Paul is MORE conservative than Ronaldus Maximus..

[pissant]

No. He might be the next Ron Paul though

[tlb]

laughable question

[darkwing104]

Now...what kind of question is that?

[FourPeas]

No.

[MontaniSemperLiberi]

BTW - The next real conservative elected president, say a Chris Christie, will have a far more profound effect than Ronald Reagan. Is is Rand Paul? Who knows?

[Stepan12]

He is like his father, so no!

Pres. Ronald Reagan was not an anti-Semite and would not associate with nuts such as truthers; etc.

[NYCslicker]

In fairness, Ronald Reagan wasn’t the next Ronald Reagan at this point in his career.

Why not give him the benefit of the doubt?

He’s a step in the right direction from where we are now, and by that I mean, Obama, McCain, Romney, Lindsey Graham, and the rest of the “wilting violet” company.

[pinochet]

>>>>Do you think Rand Paul would have the courage or the political philosophy to compel him to tell Mr. Gorbachev to “Tear down this wall”?

What I do know, is that Rand Paul will prevent America from ending up a bankrupt country like Greece. When America becomes a broke and bankrupt nation, they will lack the financial ability to threaten anyone, and the Iranians will laugh at any American threats.

[deener]

Rand who????

[Minus_The_Bear]

I do think that Grayson and Mitch McConnell are more big bailout, Obamacare RINOs.

Mitch McConnell should resign for how he has collaborated with Obama. His lying to James Dobson about Rand Paul was typical.

[UCFRoadWarrior]

I can see the Liberal Globalists in the GOP squealing big time....their Soros-funded liberal globalist new world order would take a severe hit

There are some things I do not agree with the Paul’s on....but their support to pull America out of the UN, WTO, and other Globalist entities would be so beneficial for the country. And, of course, the biggest critics of the Paul’s are supporters of the UN, WTO, NAFTA, etc....which are also supported by people like Gore, Clinton, Boxer, George Soros....

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Nope.