[rdl6989]

Even if it’s a biological impossibility??? I’m afraid we’re going to see a lot more of this.

[Nevermore]

Camilla B. Taylor, an attorney with Lambda Legal, argued that birth certificates had to do with social, rather than biological, reality. "The purpose of spousal presumption of legitimacy--and Iowa’s birth certificate which reflects the presumption--has always been to protect children from the historic stigma of what was termed ‘illegitimacy’ or ‘bastardy,'" she said.

Silly me, I always thought it was a "health" issue.
And now I'm kinda curious, given the Orwellian logic: does the "mother" on the certificate really have to be the mother, or could the mother be the "father"? Maybe that doesn't matter, either, given that it is a "social" document.

[SumProVita]

“The first effect of not believing in God that you lose your common sense.” GK Chesterton

Chesterton was correct.

[Dilbert San Diego]

Ya, I was going to say, it’s biologically impossible for both girls to be biological parents of the baby.

If Lambda Legal and gay activists would take a deep breath and slow down, they could look into 2nd parent adoption or other legal status for the lesbian who didn’t give birth in cases like this.

Instead, they want to shove it down everyone’s throat.