Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Tom Campbell really say this?
email | Thu, May 13, 2010 9:15:16 AM | Tom Campbell

Posted on 05/14/2010 9:03:56 AM PDT by Redcloak

The following is allegedly an email from Tom Campbell. "David" wrote to him asking for clarification of his position on using the TSA "No-fly" list to prohibit the purchase or possession of a firearm by a listed individual. Mr. Campbell supposedly supports using the TSA's list to deny Americans their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms and to do so without a trial...

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Tom Campbell
To:
Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 9:15:16 AM
Subject: Thank you for contacting me - Tom Campbell

Dear David,

     Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your insight about the TSA no-fly list. I appreciate your perspective and for giving me the opportunity to respond.

     The US Constitution has been held by the US Supreme Court to include the right to travel. Unless you're against the no-fly list in its entirety, therefore, you would have to grant that that constitutional right, the right to travel, can be limited while an individual is on the no-fly list. It would be totally inconsistent to say it's unsafe to trust that person on a flight, but perfectly OK for that person to purchase a weapon while on the no-fly list.

     An individual denied the right to board a plane, or the right to purchase a weapon, can get off the no-fly list, and then exercise those rights again. It's a temporary status, and it can be challenged. Any individual denied a constitutional right without due process can bring an action under federal law to seek to have their rights declared as infringed, and to order the end of that infringement.

     If you are, however, against the no-fly list in any application, then we simply have a disagreement on what's good policy for our country during this war on terrorism.

     Again, thank you for contacting me.

Kindly,

Tom


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; carlyfiorina; chuckdevore; devore; palinforfiorina; rino; tomcampbell
This is from an email. It is, of course, unverifiable. We are told that a lie can go around the world before the truth has even put its boots on. Therefore, this post is the perfect opportunity for Mr. Campbell to put his boots on and tell voters that he does not support the denial of our Constitutional rights by bureaucratic fiat.
1 posted on 05/14/2010 9:03:56 AM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Yes he said this at the last CA US Senate debate:
http://www.mercurynews.com/columns/ci_15070492?nclick_check=1


2 posted on 05/14/2010 9:11:42 AM PDT by redcoyote7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Tom said in the most recent debate that individuals who end up on a no fly list should not be able to buy a gun even if they have not been convicted of anything. I don’t agree with his position. Someone could be put on a no fly list for being disorderly or by accident. The key is if you are a citizen and on the no fly list and have not been convicted of anything that restricts your second amendment rights then you should be able to purchase a gun. What the government decided that certain Tea Party and Militia groups are dangerous and should be on no fly lists?


3 posted on 05/14/2010 9:16:37 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Tyranny thrives when the people are silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Clarification of why a person in put on the no fly list in the first place is needed. Verification of the email is needed also. As far as I know Tom Campbell has been a solid Constitutional Republican for years.
4 posted on 05/14/2010 9:16:42 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

“Campbell supports abortion rights and gay marriage, and argues that Boxer’s greatest asset against either of his two Republican opponents, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina and state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, would be the state’s decidedly un-conservative social views.

“She has always been able to move the debate over to the social issues. She will not be able to do that against me,” Campbell told POLITICO.”

“During the campaign for U.S. Senate in 2000, Campbell touted his 100 percent pro-choice voting record. He opposed a ban on “partial birth’ abortions, one of the most horrific abortion practices. (”Conservatives Agonize Backing Campbell,” Roll Call, August 7, 2000.)

Campbell in 1992 made abortion the center stage of his campaign. In the 1992 election, Campbell’s TV ad ran with the following caption: “For choice, for jobs, for U.S. Senate.” In another ad, he said, “I’m pro-choice and one of the most conservative members of Congress when it comes to spending.”In a Republican debate, he described his abortion views, as good for voters “looking for someone who is willing to break with the party line from time to time.” (Gerry Braun, “Herschensohn Won’t Pledge to Back GOP Pick; Senate Opponents Renew Acrimony in Last Debate,” San Diego Union Tribune, June 1, 1992.)


5 posted on 05/14/2010 9:29:15 AM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

I am not sure that being on the no-fly list is a real infringement on your right to travel.

It is a restriction on the method of travel. You can still drive or walk (if need be).

Infringement on the right to travel would be like house arrest.

Nonetheless, no-fly list and 2nd ammendment should not be mixed.


6 posted on 05/14/2010 9:37:48 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
LA Times-GOP Senate candidates spar in first face-to-face debate

"Campbell was the first to answer a question about whether individuals on the no-fly list should be permitted to purchase a gun. He said they should not, but both Fiorina and DeVore disagreed.

"Oh my goodness," Campbell said after the other two candidates answered.

"That's why Tom Campbell has kind of a poor rating from the National Rifle Assn., right there," Fiorina interjected.

"I can't believe what I'm hearing," Campbell said. "Wait until you're off the no-fly list then exercise your 2nd Amendment rights. That is not an infringement on anyone's 2nd Amendment rights, and it seems somewhat unusual to take that position, except perhaps in a Republican primary."

Fiorina said she knew people who had been on the no-fly list and that the list has been "way too large."

7 posted on 05/14/2010 9:38:55 AM PDT by ansel12 (MITT: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Three letters describe this guy... POS. He is to me because of this and that is the way that it is.

LLS


8 posted on 05/14/2010 11:03:47 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson