Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US allowed drilling 'without required permits'
Telegraph (UK) ^ | Friday 14 May 2010 | | By an AFP reporter in Washington

Posted on 05/14/2010 8:00:24 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

A troubled US government agency tasked with managing oil exploration allowed BP and other oil companies to drill in the Gulf of Mexico without first obtaining required permits, a complaint said.


Oil spill scandal: an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, with a complaint claims the Department of Interior has approved over 300 drilling operations, three large lease sales and over 100 seismic surveys without the required permits Photo: AP

The approvals by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) included greenlighting the well drilled by the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig that exploded on April 20, killing 11 workers before burning, sinking and spewing a sea of crude into the gulf, The New York Times reported, citing federal records.

Under the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the minerals agency is required to obtain permits before allowing drilling to go ahead in areas where the oil exploration could harm endangered species or marine mammals.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bp; deephorz; deepwaterhorizon; energy; offshore; oil; oilspill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2010 8:00:25 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Needless to say, if this had happened under the Bush administration this would be making headlines in the US.


2 posted on 05/14/2010 8:01:26 AM PDT by cvq3842 (Freedom is worth fighting for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842; BOBTHENAILER; SierraWasp; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; onyx

CNBC was teasing earlier with a planned appearance and talk by our leader this morning (I think 11:45 EST ) on the Oil Spill.


3 posted on 05/14/2010 8:04:21 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Change You Can Believe In!!!


4 posted on 05/14/2010 8:05:19 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

.
Would it really have made a difference?


5 posted on 05/14/2010 8:06:05 AM PDT by Touch Not the Cat (Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

First Obama attacks the banks, while being one of the biggest recipients of their gravy and having been involved in lowering the lending standards and fighting regulation of derivatives. It’s the dirty bankers’ fault, not his.

Then he attacks Wall Street, while being one of the biggest recipients of political donations, and working hand in glove with Goldman Sachs.

Now he attacks the oil companies, and threatens to increase their taxes, and shuts down offshore exploration, while being the biggest recipient of donations from British Petroleum.

Can you say, “Chicago way”? I knew you could.

Oilman Bush’s fault? Oilman Cheney’s fault?

The article says this happened: “Under (Interior Secretary Ken) Salazar’s watch.”


6 posted on 05/14/2010 8:06:39 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Who determined BP did not have the required permits? How do companies get permits? Who signs off on them? I don’t believe anything from anyone anymore.


7 posted on 05/14/2010 8:19:08 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

“Needless to say, if this had happened under the Bush administration this would be making headlines in the US.”

It would read:

Bush allowed drilling ‘without required permits’


8 posted on 05/14/2010 8:19:26 AM PDT by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Touch Not the Cat
Related thread:

Obama sheltered BP's Deepwater Horizon rig from regulatory requirement

9 posted on 05/14/2010 8:20:46 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842; God luvs America; Cicero; ilovesarah2012; bestintxas

See #9...this is getting interesting....


10 posted on 05/14/2010 8:23:18 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; cvq3842; Cicero; ilovesarah2012; bestintxas; All

“The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely. “

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/04/AR2010050404118.html


11 posted on 05/14/2010 8:29:13 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Instead of regulatory requirements being fulfilled,
the $$$$$$$$$$$ went to Obama.

The $$$$$$$$$$$ went to Obama, but the MSM will never
cover it. The MSM is worse than Pravda at its worst.


12 posted on 05/14/2010 8:41:29 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States Â… shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

“Where’s the oil? Model suggests much may be gone”

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100514/ap_on_sc/us_gulf_spill_where_s_the_oil


13 posted on 05/14/2010 8:51:53 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Yup.


14 posted on 05/14/2010 9:16:59 AM PDT by cvq3842 (Freedom is worth fighting for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks.


15 posted on 05/14/2010 9:17:33 AM PDT by cvq3842 (Freedom is worth fighting for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Thanks.


16 posted on 05/14/2010 9:17:58 AM PDT by cvq3842 (Freedom is worth fighting for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842; All

think this has anything to do with the fact BP donated more $$$ to emperor obama than any other candidate?


17 posted on 05/14/2010 9:27:14 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The irony of it. If hearings proceed, which they will. Obi’s gang will be called out over this one. The MSM will not be able to protect them.


18 posted on 05/14/2010 4:50:52 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

That Minerals Management Service (MMS) may have some more secrets to be revealed...from what I heard on Kudlow .

Will be watching the news reports ....


19 posted on 05/14/2010 6:07:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Specifics:

U.S. exempted BP's Gulf of Mexico drilling from environmental impact study

********************************EXCERPT ************************************

By Juliet Eilperin Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 5, 2010

The Interior Department exempted BP's calamitous Gulf of Mexico drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely.

The decision by the department's Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BP's lease at Deepwater Horizon a "categorical exclusion" from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009 -- and BP's lobbying efforts just 11 days before the explosion to expand those exemptions -- show that neither federal regulators nor the company anticipated an accident of the scale of the one unfolding in the gulf.

Rethinking the rules

Now, environmentalists and some key senators are calling for a reassessment of safety requirements for offshore drilling.

Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), who has supported offshore oil drilling in the past, said, "I suspect you're going to see an entirely different regime once people have a chance to sit back and take a look at how do we anticipate and clean up these potential environmental consequences" from drilling.

BP spokesman Toby Odone said the company's appeal for NEPA waivers in the past "was based on the spill and incident-response history in the Gulf of Mexico." Once the various investigations of the new spill have been completed, he added, "the causes of this incident can be applied to determine any changes in the regulatory regime that are required to protect the environment."


20 posted on 05/14/2010 6:13:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson