[MetaThought]

It is very convenient to ignore the references in the wiki. Since all other sources are “worthless”, ICR is of course, the only source that matters.

[wendy1946]

Wikipedia is a known quantity. It is wonderfully useful for any sort of thing for which no controversy could plausibly exist, e.g. how does a two-stroke diesel engine work?, where is the city of Gdansk and how many people live there?, when did Marco Polo visit China etc. etc. etc.

For anything such as the present topic which involves major controversies, Wiki is totally worthless.

[wendy1946]

"The researchers found that what previously had been identified as remnants of blood cells, because of the presence of iron, were actually framboids, microscopic mineral spheres bearing iron."

I mean, the real question is how do iron particles create the blood vessels which were also seen in the samples???

Smithsonian article:

Neatly dressed in blue Capri pants and a sleeveless top, long hair flowing over her bare shoulders, Mary Schweitzer sits at a microscope in a dim lab, her face lit only by a glowing computer screen showing a network of thin, branching vessels. That’s right, blood vessels. From a dinosaur. “Ho-ho-ho, I am excite-e-e-e-d,” she chuckles. “I am, like, really excited.” Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html#ixzz0o95cc6e5

See what I mean about wikipedia? I mean, Jesus could come again and turn all the junk in every junkyard in America into gold for a sign and a the same wiki-weenies who erased the 5000 articles about the midieval climate optimum would be claiming it was a hoax.