Posted on 05/13/2010 12:04:46 AM PDT by Sarajevo
After years of political pressure from Texas politicians, U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar said Monday that he expects the federal government to deliver unmanned aircraft to watch over the border with Mexico by this fall.
Cuellar, a Democrat from Laredo, said he has had discussions with top officials from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's office of air and marine operations, and they agreed to the timetable, subject to Federal Aviation Administration approval to allow the surveillance planes often referred to in the political vernacular as "Predator drones" to fly over Texas.
Laura Brown, an FAA spokeswoman, said the administration is "working as quickly as we can on this."
Cuellar said the FAA told him that regulators' main concern has been with Texas' heavy airplane traffic both private and commercial.
If approved, the unmanned aircraft in Texas would add to the federal government's existing border effort, which includes a handful of other unmanned aircraft, 20,000 Border Patrol agents, about 650 miles of border fence and 41 mobile surveillance systems, according to Customs and Border Protection.
The plane, which is made by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems and officially called a Predator B, is able to spot illegal border activity and send images in real time to border officials.
At that point, Border Patrol agents could be dispatched, according to Customs and Border Protection.
Cuellar along with Sens. John Cornyn and Kay Bailey Hutchison and Gov. Rick Perry has been trying to bring the unmanned aircraft to Texas for years.
Cornyn and Perry, both Republicans, have been among the most vocal critics of the regulators' pace.
"Washington needs to quit fiddling while the border region of America burns," said Perry, who has been calling for Predators since 2005.
Also last week, Cornyn said that the FAA's pace "borders on foot-dragging."
Cuellar has refrained from using harsh words directed at the FAA.
Instead, he invited FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt and Alan Bersin, the commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, to his office on May 20 to make sure an agreement can be reached.
"My interest in this is to get this done as quickly as possible," he said.
Cuellar, who leads the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border, Maritime and Global Counterterrorism, has asked the FAA to give priority to Texas' request.
Cuellar and Customs and Border Protection officials said a home for a Texas-based Predator already has been identified at Naval Air Station-Corpus Christi.
Kimberly Kasitz, a spokeswoman for General Atomics, said one unmanned aircraft costs $10 million to $12 million.
Discussions in Washington have centered on bringing one Predator to Texas to be deployed along the border with Mexico to fight drug trafficking, human smuggling and violent Mexican drug cartels.
The Texas plane is still under construction, Cuellar said. If it is not ready by the time the FAA approves its flight, then one would be borrowed from another location, Cuellar said. He would not say where because of security concerns.
Places with unmanned aircraft systems in the U.S. include Arizona, which has three; North Dakota, which has two; and Florida, with one.
Unmanned aircraft have grown quickly in popularity in the defense and surveillance sectors, said Peter W. Singer, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and the author of "Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century."
Since 2003, the military has acquired about 7,000 unmanned aircraft that are flying surveillance and combat missions in overseas wars, Singer said, and it happened "in a bureaucratic blink of an eye."
And even today, each branch of the military remains eager to obtain more.
"Basically, the Air Force is buying them as fast as they can," Singer said.
Meanwhile, Customs and Border Protection has said it intends to increase unmanned aircraft systems across the country this year, and it expects a complete network of the unmanned planes all along the border by 2015.
Officials boasted about the Predators' effectiveness in a fact sheet published in February 2009. They reported that Predator B planes have flown more than 1,500 hours and contributed to the seizure of more than 15,000 pounds of marijuana and the apprehension of more than 4,000 undocumented people.
But more can be accomplished with the unmanned aircraft, Cuellar said Monday.
Discussions already have taken place about turning the Predator's high-resolution cameras, which Cuellar said could read a label on a bottle of water from 19,000 feet, on to Mexico to track movements of drug cartels.
But there are still a lot of sovereignty issues, Cuellar added, so any advancement of the idea would be up to Mexican government officials.
Sorry, just contemplating the day when there aren't any more "evil messicans" to worry about and DHS needs to keep it's "highly trained" donut-munchers employed.
I hear you.
This is not the way to secure the border. Put up double fences and patrol between them. This is what the Israelis do and it works just fine.
Necessary evil.
Have you ever seen a dumber administration than Obama’s?
Carter and Clinton were bad; but this guy can’t even compete against a box of rocks.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against an Army.....?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2312894/posts?page=242
I was pondering Obama’s personality today as an avg Joe American.
I thought about his Split personality.
Person 1. Barry the White Metrosexual squeamish doofus guy.
Person 2. Obama the Black Radical Socialist with a Psuedeo Intellect.
I wondered if he ever has conflict with the two which renders him helpless to cope.
Just my 2 cents.
Spare no expense!
Anything to avoid, simply building the fence.
Deport illegal aliens when detected, severally fine employers of illegals, don't count illegals when apportioning Federal funds/congressional seats and prosecute “sanctuary city” promoters for conspiracy to commit illegal immigrating. Piece of cake fix and no intrusion into legitimate resident's/citizen's liberties.
I am willing to bet that not a single Border Patrol agent goes out on anything more than a enforcement publicity stunt.
This is an incredible waste of money and military resources when a simple fence would be enormously more effective at actually stopping a large fraction of border-jumpers.
Defense in depth: put up a large, double fence. Yes, some enterprising criminal might put a hole in it, but the large majority of casual border-jumpers are going to be deterred. The occasional maintenance of fixing holes in a physical fence running 1000 miles is a lot less than trying to pay for enough UAVs to comprehensively watch that same 1000 miles.
No one is going to be deterred by a stupid UAV that they won't even see. The administration will not actually act on any detection that they do make. This is pointless and wasteful.
...and what is it suppose to do? Say hey, over here. So now we spend millions just watching them walk across anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.