To: Publius
Obama has reportedly told top aides he wants to be the first president to appoint 3 women to the high court. Why? Why wouldn't you want the best available jurist, regardless of sex or skin color? Just a rhetorical question.
To: Pearls Before Swine
OH, c’mon...YOU KNOW WHY....
15 posted on
05/12/2010 1:13:00 PM PDT by
goodnesswins
(Destroy AMERICA.....Vote DEMOCRAT)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Why? Why wouldn't you want the best available jurist, regardless of sex or skin color? Just a rhetorical question. Or best brain surgeon...
In the Supreme Court, with liberal "living Constitution" activist judges, it isn't about being able to read the document and discern the meaning, it's about gaming the system to justify a conclusion you've already reached...
28 posted on
05/12/2010 1:19:14 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The hysteria of Matthewsism and Andersonism has led to a Tea Party Scare that is unAmerican.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Because people actually want those to be based on the content of their character, not the color of their skin (or gender)
UNLESS
It’s you making the decision. Then you can discriminate all you want.
46 posted on
05/12/2010 1:45:04 PM PDT by
GeorgiaDawg32
(Why protest fur and not leather? Ever try to hassle a motorcycle gang?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson