1 posted on
05/12/2010 12:52:35 PM PDT by
yongin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: yongin
His numbers were sinking, so how can we get his numbers up - Let’s have a bogus poll! Yep, that’s the ticket.
Looks like the media wants RINO Newt. To make it look honest, they include Sarah.
To: yongin
Its a Democrat affilaited poll. What do you expect.
Rassmussen’s figures do NOT reflect this.
38 posted on
05/12/2010 1:05:20 PM PDT by
ZULU
To: yongin
All meaningless. 30 months is an eternity in politics. A lot can and will happen prior to November 2012.
40 posted on
05/12/2010 1:06:04 PM PDT by
kabar
To: yongin
It’s about what I would expect with so many possible Republican contenders, and the split between conservatives and Keynesian, mushy Republicans. Also, the economy has the appearance of improving, but the path to 2012 is loaded with landmines.
45 posted on
05/12/2010 1:09:38 PM PDT by
pallis
To: yongin
I do not believe one word of this. The lying never stops anymore.
46 posted on
05/12/2010 1:09:56 PM PDT by
dforest
To: yongin
Must be a Baghdad Bob poll.
47 posted on
05/12/2010 1:10:19 PM PDT by
Apercu
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
To: yongin
55 posted on
05/12/2010 1:26:16 PM PDT by
LibFreeUSA
(Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
To: yongin
I guess everybody was fine with the health insurance jam down then. Add to that his flawless performance on terrorism, foreign policy (why just last week Iran handed over their nuclear...oh, maybe not), and the economy and the poll all makes sense. Why isn't McCain in the poll? They picked him for us last time. Why don't they just include him in their new picks just for fun? Funny how the pick that has slapped Obama back the hardest, Palin, just happens to do the worst.
59 posted on
05/12/2010 1:35:07 PM PDT by
throwback
( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
To: yongin
My opinion is that the rats and their followers are desperately attempting to identify the next Republican candidate, in order to prepare their MASSIVE ATTACKS.
As long as they don’t have anything firm to go on, they will waste their time manufacturing dirt on any and all candidates they imagine is the ONE, in vain attempts to draw our candidate out into the open.
SO, better to never use our candidate’s real name until it is absolutely necessary. Say, at the Republican convention. That would be a good time to reveal his name.
And, we should also refer to the candidate as HE and HIM all the time until it is no longer necessary. No sense in dropping hints for the little ferrets to follow.
To: yongin
64 posted on
05/12/2010 1:46:19 PM PDT by
angelcindy
("If you follow the crowd,you get no further than the crowd")
To: yongin
Let’s flip this and look at how bad he is doing after only 1 year in office!
To: yongin
This poll is a pile of crap.
Regardless, I’m sure 0’s popularity will continue to dive until election day ‘12.
Palin ‘12!
66 posted on
05/12/2010 2:09:27 PM PDT by
PreciousLiberty
(In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.)
To: yongin
Eh...not a lot of GOP choices there. I hope none of them are the eventual nominee. I love Palin, but think she’d have a hard time winning in a general with the bashing she gets. I hope I’m wrong though. And I think Pawlenty is definitely running...ugh.
Anyway, hope there’s more/better choices than that such as Ryan, Thune, Daniels, Hoeven...
67 posted on
05/12/2010 2:15:09 PM PDT by
SMCC1
To: yongin
The incumbent President barely beating a challenger should be ringing alarm bells all around the Democrat Party, not be spun as a sign of his “strength”
71 posted on
05/12/2010 2:29:13 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson