I had read the entire article but missed that one line.
He does say the country is in a anti-incumbent mood but does not ascribe Bennett’s defeat to this.
Sorry for the mistake.
His main point is “Over the last year, there’s been a lot of Beltway talk about how the “tea parties” are really “Astroturf” activists in the employ of the GOP. If that were the case, they certainly wouldn’t have taken down Bennett”
In today’s political environment, anti-incumbent really can be equated to anti-Democrat and anti-RINO.
Just look at WHO ( i.e. which party) is in control of our government and look at the poll ratings of congress and I don’t see how being anti-incumbent can’t be equated to anti-Democrat.
In fact, those who ran on a platform OPPOSING today’s incumbent policies, WIN.