To: mojitojoe
It would have been much easier for a Republican to run against Mollohan than Oliverio. There were so many lines attack against Mollohan, but not much on Oliverio.
35 posted on
05/11/2010 7:31:30 PM PDT by
nbenyo
To: nbenyo
It would have been much easier for a Republican to run against Mollohan than Oliverio. There were so many lines attack against Mollohan, but not much on Oliverio. That's why I keep saying that we have to run against the Party. The mere fact of a D after Oliverio's name means that he helps Nancy Pelosi to retain control of the House, and therefore, even though he may personally oppose the leftist agenda, he helps to advance it nevertheless.
38 posted on
05/11/2010 7:34:56 PM PDT by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: nbenyo
Oliverio will vote to put Pelosi back in as Speaker-that is reason enough to vote against him.
131 posted on
05/13/2010 5:16:50 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson