Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
So I think a translation of “the native, or indigenous person” is vastly superior to “the native, or natural born citizen” - and certainly reject the idea that NBC is the definitive translation, for legal purposes, of a document that makes one reference to “Indigenes”.

Of course you do. But the 1793/97 translator did not agree with you.

Nor did whomever translated the July 27, 1781 pages of the Journals of the Continental Congress, where "naturels" is translated as "natural born" modifying sujets (subjects). (the agreement was with the French who had a King at the time)

29 posted on 05/11/2010 9:16:11 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

“Nor did whomever translated the July 27, 1781 pages of the Journals of the Continental Congress, where “naturels” is translated as “natural born” modifying sujets (subjects). (the agreement was with the French who had a King at the time”

Natural subject has a different meaning than natural by itself. Thus by itself it was translated native.


33 posted on 05/11/2010 10:00:31 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson