Can’t be worse than the ridiculous lib she’s replacing.
I can appreciate your standpoint, but that’s exactly the problem we have with the USSC. The Pubbies roll over because “she’s just replacing another liberal.”
That’s not the point! We’re talking about the Constitution here.
Justice Stevens was a liberal, but more wise and more old school liberal. This Kagan is a fool as her argument noted here shows. She is so dim, she went ahead parroting what her minions at the office wrote for her without having the analytical brains to see it was a misreading of the issue at hand. Why, because she is outcome and agenda based, not caring or seeing the particular issue at hand.
Oh yes she can be worse, and she’s MUCH younger so we can have her for about 40 years if she’s lucky.