Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE MYSTERY OF ELENA KAGAN
boblonsberry.com ^ | 05/11/10 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 05/11/2010 6:22:59 AM PDT by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: shortstop

A better question.

Does Kagan know what is written in The Constitution?
Does Kagan care what is written in The Constitution?


41 posted on 05/11/2010 7:21:47 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (Please God, watch over our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Kevin James is better looking.


42 posted on 05/11/2010 7:24:49 AM PDT by KEmom (Getting ready to hop on the Tea Party Express!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I've said it before and I'll say it again:

If she's NOT gay, somewheres out there is a guy who lost the worst bar bet in the history of the world.

43 posted on 05/11/2010 7:24:59 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

I’m going one step further: I would say she’s a post-op transsexual! She’s a he!


44 posted on 05/11/2010 7:31:13 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

LOL!


45 posted on 05/11/2010 7:33:57 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

I’m still wondering about David (don’t call me Dave) Souter.


46 posted on 05/11/2010 7:37:34 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
“Moreover, personal sexual preferences were very much relevant and permissible when Clarence Thomas was being grilled like spare rib on a spit. “

Good point.

I'm not homosexual. I can understand there are homosexuals out there who don't proselytize and don't expect preferential treatment. If someone is a homosexual, but they don't allow their own personal issues to impact the way they view Constitutional ones - perhaps an unrealistic expectation in many or most cases - ideally, it shouldn;t be an issue.

In this case, it seems she would make it as issue based on statements about don't ask don't tell and ROTC on campus.

As an aside - take a look at this woman. Does she look “normal” - from a purely physical perspective?

I don’ think so. Viewing her from a biological perspective, her physical appearance seems to mix masculine and feminine traits to some degree. While she dresses and appears to be a biological female, she also exhibits some very strongly masculine traits.

My point here is that there are two kinds of “homosexual”:
people who are driven to it by accident of biology and people who do it by compulsion through deliberate choice. In any population, the number of people who fall in to the first category are by necessity small. In a breeding population, exclusive biological homosexuality is a biological dead end. They can't reproduce themselves. In SOME populations, a cultural “compulsion” or perversion, if you will, takes hold of a significant portion of that population, and homosexuality as well as possibly other perversions are practiced by choice or compulsion, not by biological imperative. Ancient Greece and, to a lesser extent, Rome, as well as the Ottoman Turks come to mind. I think Ms. Kagan falls into the first category.

So, we should understand that there are some people who can't help their homosexual inclinations, but at the same time we should recognize it for the biological aberration it is, and while tolerating them, NOT accept it as a normative cultural or behavioral practice, lest we become another Ancient Greece, Rome or Ottoman society - something liberals are trying their best to achieve.

47 posted on 05/11/2010 7:41:52 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

As far as appearance goes, she looks very much like a lady I knew with serious thyroid issues. She had very brittle hair she had to keep short, and thickened jaw and neck.


48 posted on 05/11/2010 7:53:43 AM PDT by Eepsy (www.pioacademy.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Yep, my first thought a dyke. And if that is true she better not hide it and she is not qualified as she is a rebrobate, devoid of right thinking.


49 posted on 05/11/2010 7:53:51 AM PDT by thirst4truth (www.Believer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: scoobysnak71

Was that a , gulp, woman in the picture that Kagan’s face is photoshopped on to???

Man, just lost my appetite!!


50 posted on 05/11/2010 7:59:52 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
>"No, I’d hit it."

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, if you want. Here, better use this.


51 posted on 05/11/2010 8:13:36 AM PDT by scoobysnak71 (Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and win through experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
>"Man, just lost my appetite!!"

I know. Real sorry about that. Here's something thats a little easier on the eyes.


52 posted on 05/11/2010 8:18:15 AM PDT by scoobysnak71 (Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and win through experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: scoobysnak71

Man, she could crush a guy to death between those thighs!!

Wonder if she took steroids?? Her face certainly looks very manly.

Well, each to his own said the old lady as she kissed the cow. (My grandmother used to always say that)


53 posted on 05/11/2010 8:35:24 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Eepsy

I’m sure if her situation was merely a thyroid issue, it would be addressed by now.

She has a definite gynanderous appearance.


54 posted on 05/11/2010 8:43:21 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
Constitution? We still have a Constitution?

Come on. No document written by white, Christian, male, (some (gasp!) slaveowners), eurocentric, hegemonic, patriarchal, gender-normative, capitalists, could possibly have any relevance in today's world.

Ask anyone at Harvard, if you don't believe me.

55 posted on 05/11/2010 8:46:09 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I can resolve this burning issue.

Solicitor General Kagan is gayer than Christmas in Tahiti.

56 posted on 05/11/2010 8:48:27 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
This entire "gay issue" should be addressed by Michelle Obama. She is in charge of "Gay Eruptions" at the WH.

Unfortunately she is tied up this week trying out as a linebacker for the Phila Eagles.

57 posted on 05/11/2010 8:52:52 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I was thinking Dick Morris. I think that Kagan looks like Dick Morris in drag.


58 posted on 05/11/2010 9:00:17 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

>”Wonder if she took steroids?? Her face certainly looks very manly.”

lol. I think sheheit has a beard. Pretty much answers that question. lol


59 posted on 05/11/2010 10:12:06 AM PDT by scoobysnak71 (Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and win through experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: scoobysnak71

I was pretty sure the answer would be ‘Yes’.

I thought I spotted a 5 o’clock shadow.!!


60 posted on 05/11/2010 10:29:27 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson