To: angcat
I agree that was always what I thought we should have done. A good nuke after 9/11 would have saved our troops and solved this problem for good.The math is simple ... really simple:
![](http://cndyorks.gn.apc.org/news/articles/vangrd.jpg)
+
![](http://www.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/trident1/trc4_s.jpg)
+
![](http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/gulf/images/mecca-26.jpg)
=
![](http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/04/17/crater_wideweb__430x260.jpg)
End of Problem
62 posted on
05/11/2010 6:40:59 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
To: tx_eggman
The math is simple ... really simple:
...
End of Problem I too subscribe to the "more rubble, less trouble" model.
A long time ago it was called Pax Romano.
90 posted on
05/11/2010 7:31:29 AM PDT by
Drill Thrawl
(Another day, another injury, another step closer. Are you prepared?)
To: tx_eggman
Only problem is your timing is off. Best to do it during their pilgrimage so its packed.
94 posted on
05/11/2010 7:36:11 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson