Kagan’s nomination, and likely approval, is a testament to all the NITWIT conservatives out there who found that Romney wasn’t perfect enough, or that McCain wasn’t perfect enough.
Well, because they weren’t perfect enough, we got Obama. And now for 40 years or so, we’ll have Kagan.
Thank you, all you highly principled conservatives who thought that Romney wasn’t conservative enough. Or that McCain wasn’t conservative enough.
Is Obama conservative enough for you? How about Sotomayor? How about Kagan?
Elections have consequences.
That is a very tiresome argument that has nothing to do with the real world. I don’t know a single conservative who voted for Obama or who refused to vote for McCain for not being “conservative enough”, so you don’t need to preach.
>Kagan’s nomination, and likely approval, is a testament to all the NITWIT conservatives out there who found that Romney wasn’t perfect enough, or that McCain wasn’t perfect enough.
John “Amnesty” McCain? *snort*
>Well, because they weren’t perfect enough, we got Obama. And now for 40 years or so, we’ll have Kagan.
You’re assuming the system won’t collapse soon.
>Thank you, all you highly principled conservatives who thought that Romney wasn’t conservative enough. Or that McCain wasn’t conservative enough.
You’re welcome / If we keep settling for ‘good enough’ how long before ‘good enough’ isn’t?
>Is Obama conservative enough for you? How about Sotomayor? How about Kagan?
>
>Elections have consequences.
Sure they do... but you’re assuming that we have fair and/or honest elections; I’m willing to bet money that Iraq’s elections are both more fair and more honest.