Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration's border fence scam exposed by investigative report
Examiner ^ | May 10, 2010 | Jim Kouri

Posted on 05/10/2010 4:10:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

While scolding the people of state of Arizona for their new immigration enforcement law, [Alleged] President Barack Obama and his minions repeatedly demonstrate their lack of enthusiasm for protecting the U.S. borders and cracking down on illegal (criminal) immigrants.

After years of debates, congressional votes, government studies and political posturing by lawmakers, the so-called "virtual fence" continues to cause more problems than it solves, according to testimony at a session of the House Homeland Security Committee.

In a compromise that met with disappointment by those who advocate tighter border security, instead of walls or chain link fencing, the U.S. Border Patrol and Homeland Security Department created the concept of virtual fence security that includes surveillance cameras, motion or heat sensing detectors, radar, and supposed state-of-the-art control towers designed to detect and prevent illegal immigration and drug smuggling into the United States. According to a report obtained by the National Association of Chiefs of Police, the security contractor -- Boeing Co. -- is installing the hi-tech physical security system. The original plan called for a completion date by December 2009 at a cost of $1.1 billion for a virtual fence. According to the report obtained by NACOP, Boeing requested that completion date to be amended by seven years.

Physical security experts told this writer it should surprise no one that a relatively simple project would become complicated and unmanageable given that fact that most of the decision-makers probably have no law enforcement, security or engineering background.

Besides the problems government officials face with the project's completion, testimony during the House Homeland Security Committee reveals that parts of the system that have been installed and placed into service frequently break down. In fact, the government report revealed that the hi-tech system rarely helps Border Patrol agents capture illegal aliens.

However, some officials still believe the concept and the program of "virtual fencing" will eventually prove successful in providing Border Patrol agents valuable assistance.

"We want to make sure we do this right," said Mark Borkowski, director of Customs and Border Protection's Secure Border Initiative or SBInet. "Yes, the [system] works," Borkowski stated emphatically.

So far, Boeing engineers have finished installation on the 23-mile "Tucson-1" phase of the project and they are now building "Ajo-1." Tucson-1 and Ajo-1 are locations in the Arizona where SBInet is being installed. The Boeing fence project is but one part of a $4 billion program to secure the U.S.'s 2,000-plus mile border with Mexico.

However, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano last Tuesday stated that about $50 million originally earmarked for SBInet will be spent on what she termed "proven technologies," rather than the high-tech Boeing designed and installed equipment.

Secretary Napolitano claims her decision is based on an internal security investigation and vulnerability assessment in which investigators discovered more than 1,200 defects in SBInet systems within a 16-month period -- March 2008 thru July 2009.

[Alleged] President Barack Obama has called for budget cuts in the SBInet funding by almost $300 million.

But Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said during the House hearing that a "dire situation" that exists on the U.S.-Mexico -- with drug gang murders in Mexico and illegal immigration -- leaves no time for delays on SBInet.

"There is a war going on," McCaul said, referring to roughly 6,000 murders in Mexico last year, most of which are suspected of being drug-related. "We cannot afford any more timeouts."

The porous border between the United States and Mexico made it nearly certain the drug violence would spill over into the United States, he said.

Congress decided to investigate problems with the virtual fence after the Government Accountability Office pointed out cost overruns and delays in a report on SBInet.

Roger Krone, Boeing's president of network and space systems, said SBInet would get better as the glitches are worked out of the first parts of the system, according to the GAO report.

"It is giving border patrol a significant tactical advantage, especially in nighttime operations," Krone said during his testimony before the Congressional committee.

 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aliens; bhoamnesty; bhoborders; bhoimmigration; borders; kouri; obama

1 posted on 05/10/2010 4:10:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Sheesh..."virtual" fence. It's simple. Concrete. Steel. Concertina wire. Flood/spot lights. Machineguns, Claymores, and the troops to man them.

Oh yeah, and deport all illegals and the slimebag business owners that employ them. End all services for illegal scumbag aliens. Amend the anchor baby provisions of the 14th Amendment.

That's a good start...I'm sure I'll come up with more.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

2 posted on 05/10/2010 4:23:48 PM PDT by wku man (Who says conservatives don't rock? Go to www.myspace.com/rockfromtheright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
What's wrong with this proven technology?



3 posted on 05/10/2010 4:25:18 PM PDT by iowamomforfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Should be pretty obvious by now, They are not going to stop illegal immigration.

Traitors.


4 posted on 05/10/2010 4:25:55 PM PDT by muddler (Obama is either incompetent or malicious, and it makes little difference which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“Physical security experts told this writer it should surprise no one that a relatively simple project would become complicated and unmanageable given that fact that most of the decision-makers probably have no law enforcement, security or engineering background.”

This is a very succint and accurate description of Government, especially the ZerO Administration.


5 posted on 05/10/2010 4:26:55 PM PDT by wac3rd (Prepare for the November 2010 Tsunami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wku man

Virtual fence will crash or have glitches or other bugs ... but buying it will make donor companies happy and RICH on over inflated costs.

That is why Congress is for it.

Plus, concrete and steel and more border agents and enforcing the laws on the books, cost votes.


6 posted on 05/10/2010 4:27:47 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamomforfreedom

Our beloved Sec of Homeland Security says ‘Why build a 14 foot fence when the illegals will only get a 15 foot ladder?”.

Sure makes me feel safer-—NOT.


7 posted on 05/10/2010 4:28:14 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
In a compromise that met with disappointment by those who advocate tighter border security, instead of walls or chain link fencing, the U.S. Border Patrol and Homeland Security Department created the concept of virtual fence security that includes surveillance cameras, motion or heat sensing detectors, radar, and supposed state-of-the-art control towers designed to detect and prevent illegal immigration and drug smuggling into the United States. According to a report obtained by the National Association of Chiefs of Police, the security contractor -- Boeing Co. -- is installing the hi-tech physical security system. The original plan called for a completion date by December 2009 at a cost of $1.1 billion for a virtual fence. According to the report obtained by NACOP, Boeing requested that completion date to be amended by seven years.
What? No "stimulus" money? Thanks EternalVigilance.
8 posted on 05/10/2010 4:34:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
‘Why build a 14 foot fence when the illegals will only get a 15 foot ladder?”.

It gives the guy in the guard tower half a mile away time to draw a bead.

/what things would be like in a sane world

9 posted on 05/10/2010 4:34:37 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO! - "Throw All The Bums Out!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
According to the report obtained by NACOP, Boeing requested that completion date to be amended by seven years.

Lets see...7 years times about a million illegals a year equals...hoo hah....7 million potential Democrat voters. Nothing to see here...move on(.org)

10 posted on 05/10/2010 4:39:15 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wku man

Like I said before, a virtual fence means virtual security.


11 posted on 05/10/2010 4:43:46 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Well, we could always electrify it...


12 posted on 05/10/2010 4:44:51 PM PDT by iowamomforfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wku man; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

Ping!


13 posted on 05/10/2010 4:47:03 PM PDT by HiJinx (~ Illegal is a Crime, it is not a Race ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

14 posted on 05/10/2010 4:48:33 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO! - "Throw All The Bums Out!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; pissant
...in a compromise that met with disappointment by those who advocate tighter border security, instead of walls or chain link fencing, the U.S. Border Patrol and Homeland Security Department created the concept of virtual fence security that includes surveillance cameras,

Compromise? In violation of the LAW.

15 posted on 05/10/2010 5:29:24 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners buTt never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

As Duncan Hunter said, he “told them that the virtual fence would be virtually worthless”. And he was right


16 posted on 05/10/2010 5:31:50 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Ask Russia, East Germany & North Korea how easy it is to secure a border. They used landmines and still couldn’t get it down.


17 posted on 05/10/2010 6:14:26 PM PDT by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RC51

There’s a mighty difference in the motivation of those who want to get in versus those who must get out.


18 posted on 05/10/2010 6:19:30 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TATBO! - "Throw All The Bums Out!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
However, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano last Tuesday stated that about $50 million originally earmarked for SBInet will be spent on what she termed "proven technologies," rather than the high-tech Boeing designed and installed equipment.

I strongly suspect she's talking about the RAID/GBOSS system, which is already deployed in the hundreds to provide wide-area protection for our troops and bases in Iraq and Afghanistan.

19 posted on 05/11/2010 3:01:12 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

They knew that, which is why they insisted on it, in violation of the explicit requirements of the LAW that was signed.


20 posted on 05/11/2010 9:26:34 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners buTt never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson