Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is she or isn't she? Let's ask her (Kagan and lesbianism)
American Family Association ^ | May 10, 2010 | Bryan Fischer

Posted on 05/10/2010 9:36:28 AM PDT by DesertRenegade

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: OafOfOffice

Obama has an ultra liberal agenda - which has been revealed - and still some don’t believe it of him. Brown’s agenda would have become apparent early on. The people of California must have wanted what Governor Moonbeam was selling.


41 posted on 05/10/2010 10:15:38 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

Californians thought he was extension of his dad. He is only AG now because of big labor. His being gay is a conflict of interest right now and few know he is gay.


42 posted on 05/10/2010 10:17:52 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

Well then, 0bagger will have to explain his sexual “status” before his buddies get really mad and demand a TSA equipment demonstration to see if he has the right package.


43 posted on 05/10/2010 10:21:20 AM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: reaganbooster
When I first saw her picture, I thought Obama nominated Chastity Bono to the Supreme Court.

Isn't that Chazz Bono now?

44 posted on 05/10/2010 10:21:47 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (www.ctf.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

Being gay is a conflict of interest? Then how can one explain Log Cabin Republicans?

Implying that because one is gay means s/he has a radical liberal agenda, seems a bit like the left’s attitude that African Americans must be Democrats or they cannot be black.


45 posted on 05/10/2010 10:23:20 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: reaganbooster

I told my husband she looked like a cross between Janet Napolitano and Chastity Bono.


46 posted on 05/10/2010 10:23:59 AM PDT by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2


47 posted on 05/10/2010 10:25:43 AM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: historyrepeatz

ROTFLABO! This is absolutely hilarious!


48 posted on 05/10/2010 10:26:57 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (I have discovered Campbell's Senior alphabet soup....it comes in large type.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BuckyKat
Lawrence Summers appointed Kagan the first female dean of Harvard Law School
49 posted on 05/10/2010 10:27:41 AM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

No more than 5 Republicans will vote against her.


50 posted on 05/10/2010 10:28:14 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

You know the Maine RINO Twins will vote for her.


51 posted on 05/10/2010 10:28:44 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mears

bfl


52 posted on 05/10/2010 10:34:56 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

Being gay and not upholding Prop 8 is a conflict of interest. Brown took a oath to uphold California’s Constitution. In this instance he has refused because his lifestyle is more important than the peoples vote. Yes, it is a huge conflict to decide when you will adhere to the Constitution and when you will not.

I do not believe all gays are ultra liberal. I have met quite a few conservatives.


53 posted on 05/10/2010 10:38:07 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: chickadee
Then how can one explain Log Cabin Republicans?

What gay republican went against the Constitution or the people's vote?

54 posted on 05/10/2010 10:39:43 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

After watching her speak my gaydar was going off loudly.


55 posted on 05/10/2010 10:44:08 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

Maybe that is why Ahmadine-jihad never wants to sit down with Obama without preconditions.


56 posted on 05/10/2010 10:45:15 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

I agree. She should out herself; instead of using pretty flowery phrases to describe her. We all know they are hiding things about her which will be brought forth whether she is given the green light or not.

They pretend to wonder why we want to rid ourselves of Congress and Obama.


57 posted on 05/10/2010 10:52:40 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Interesting choice of words ;-)


58 posted on 05/10/2010 10:54:46 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
Maybe that is why Ahmadine-jihad never wants to sit down with Obama without preconditions.

Ahmadi-Nejad will sit with 0bama under the following conditions:

1- A rule when they meet: Don't touch, don't kiss 2- Plexiglass in between when in conference

59 posted on 05/10/2010 10:58:53 AM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Will Sessions ask her whether her sexual preferences color her view of military policy? Will it then color her view of the Constitution and make her less likely to follow it in favor of her own biases?

Those are the kinds of questions she needs to answer under oath.

60 posted on 05/10/2010 11:00:11 AM PDT by Defiant (At what point will average Democrats say their leaders have gone too far? Is there any limit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson