Skip to comments.
Is she or isn't she? Let's ask her (Kagan and lesbianism)
American Family Association ^
| May 10, 2010
| Bryan Fischer
Posted on 05/10/2010 9:36:28 AM PDT by DesertRenegade
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: OafOfOffice
Obama has an ultra liberal agenda - which has been revealed - and still some don’t believe it of him. Brown’s agenda would have become apparent early on. The people of California must have wanted what Governor Moonbeam was selling.
To: chickadee
Californians thought he was extension of his dad. He is only AG now because of big labor. His being gay is a conflict of interest right now and few know he is gay.
42
posted on
05/10/2010 10:17:52 AM PDT
by
OafOfOffice
(W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
To: OafOfOffice
Well then, 0bagger will have to explain his sexual “status” before his buddies get really mad and demand a TSA equipment demonstration to see if he has the right package.
To: reaganbooster
When I first saw her picture, I thought Obama nominated Chastity Bono to the Supreme Court. Isn't that Chazz Bono now?
44
posted on
05/10/2010 10:21:47 AM PDT
by
CT-Freeper
(www.ctf.org)
To: OafOfOffice
Being gay is a conflict of interest? Then how can one explain Log Cabin Republicans?
Implying that because one is gay means s/he has a radical liberal agenda, seems a bit like the left’s attitude that African Americans must be Democrats or they cannot be black.
To: reaganbooster
I told my husband she looked like a cross between Janet Napolitano and Chastity Bono.
46
posted on
05/10/2010 10:23:59 AM PDT
by
murron
(Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
To: UCANSEE2
To: historyrepeatz
ROTFLABO! This is absolutely hilarious!
48
posted on
05/10/2010 10:26:57 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(I have discovered Campbell's Senior alphabet soup....it comes in large type.!)
To: BuckyKat
Lawrence Summers appointed Kagan the first female dean of Harvard Law School
49
posted on
05/10/2010 10:27:41 AM PDT
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: Responsibility2nd
No more than 5 Republicans will vote against her.
To: Jim Noble
You know the Maine RINO Twins will vote for her.
51
posted on
05/10/2010 10:28:44 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Mears
52
posted on
05/10/2010 10:34:56 AM PDT
by
Mears
To: chickadee
Being gay and not upholding Prop 8 is a conflict of interest. Brown took a oath to uphold California’s Constitution. In this instance he has refused because his lifestyle is more important than the peoples vote. Yes, it is a huge conflict to decide when you will adhere to the Constitution and when you will not.
I do not believe all gays are ultra liberal. I have met quite a few conservatives.
53
posted on
05/10/2010 10:38:07 AM PDT
by
OafOfOffice
(W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
To: chickadee
Then how can one explain Log Cabin Republicans? What gay republican went against the Constitution or the people's vote?
54
posted on
05/10/2010 10:39:43 AM PDT
by
OafOfOffice
(W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
To: DesertRenegade
After watching her speak my gaydar was going off loudly.
To: melancholy
Maybe that is why Ahmadine-jihad never wants to sit down with Obama without preconditions.
56
posted on
05/10/2010 10:45:15 AM PDT
by
OafOfOffice
(W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
To: DesertRenegade
I agree. She should out herself; instead of using pretty flowery phrases to describe her. We all know they are hiding things about her which will be brought forth whether she is given the green light or not.
They pretend to wonder why we want to rid ourselves of Congress and Obama.
57
posted on
05/10/2010 10:52:40 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: isthisnickcool
Interesting choice of words ;-)
58
posted on
05/10/2010 10:54:46 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
To: OafOfOffice
Maybe that is why Ahmadine-jihad never wants to sit down with Obama without preconditions. Ahmadi-Nejad will sit with 0bama under the following conditions:
1- A rule when they meet: Don't touch, don't kiss 2- Plexiglass in between when in conference
To: DesertRenegade
Will Sessions ask her whether her sexual preferences color her view of military policy? Will it then color her view of the Constitution and make her less likely to follow it in favor of her own biases?
Those are the kinds of questions she needs to answer under oath.
60
posted on
05/10/2010 11:00:11 AM PDT
by
Defiant
(At what point will average Democrats say their leaders have gone too far? Is there any limit?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson