Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. and other big powers back Mideast nuclear arms ban (Obama to force Israel to disarm)
Reuters ^ | May 9, 2010 | Reuters

Posted on 05/09/2010 6:27:43 PM PDT by SmartInsight

The United States, Russia, Britain, France and China voiced support on Wednesday for making the Middle East a nuclear-weapons-free zone, which would ultimately force Israel to scrap any atomic arms it has.

The move, in a joint statement, reflected U.S. concern to win Arab backing for sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program by offering a concession over its ally Israel, but Washington says the zone cannot be actually established yet.

"We are committed to a full implementation of the 1995 NPT resolution on the Middle East and we support all ongoing efforts to this end," the five permanent U.N. Security Council members said in a statement issued at a conference taking stock of the 1970 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The 1995 resolution adopted by signatories of the landmark arms control treaty called for making the Middle East a zone without nuclear arms. The Jewish state has never confirmed or denied having nuclear arms.

"We are ready to consider all relevant proposals in the course of the (NPT) Review Conference in order to come to an agreed decision aimed at taking concrete steps in this direction," said the statement, which was obtained by Reuters.

U.S. support for the idea of creating such a zone in the future could be unwelcome to Israel, which has said it can only consider it once there is Middle East peace.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhofascism; bhoislamism; bhotyranny; democrats; dhimmicrats; iran; israel; nuclear; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last
Obama making sure to disarm Israel, so only Iran and Syria will have nukes.

Are American Jews still going to vote for Democrats in November?

1 posted on 05/09/2010 6:27:43 PM PDT by SmartInsight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

And if Israel tells them to stuff it? How can other countries impose this on them without their consent?


2 posted on 05/09/2010 6:29:33 PM PDT by coydog (Time to feed the pigs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

I hope the Israelis tell the Kenyan where to shove it. He doesn’t represent the people of the United States of America. The jackass is talking for the cowardly buffoons at the U.N.


3 posted on 05/09/2010 6:31:33 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Had enough "history" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coydog

Well other countries won’t be able to impose this by force of arms.Not while Israel has 250 to 750 nukes.


4 posted on 05/09/2010 6:32:03 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop thinking about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Just WOW - never thought I would read something like that. I would say big trouble is ahead. And I usually don’t say such things. :)


5 posted on 05/09/2010 6:32:08 PM PDT by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
Not gonna happen.
6 posted on 05/09/2010 6:32:17 PM PDT by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

“The previous U.S. administration (Bush Administration) infuriated Arab and other non-aligned nations by refusing to reaffirm those pledges — and the call for a Middle East nuclear-arms-free zone — at the last NPT review conference in 2005. That conference was widely viewed as a failure.”

Failure for whom, for the Arab terrorists nations? Bush stood by Israel, didn’t sell her out to the Arabs, as Obama is doing now. I hope the 66% American Jewish voters, who voted for Obama, are re-thinking their votes right about now


7 posted on 05/09/2010 6:32:36 PM PDT by SmartInsight (Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote. ~ G. J. Nathan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Yup—its all about making Israel disarm so only Iran has nukes. That way when the Jews are incinerated, there will be no collateral damage. And, BTW, what about Pakistan??


8 posted on 05/09/2010 6:33:07 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Good Luck with that, Zero.


9 posted on 05/09/2010 6:33:47 PM PDT by ez ("Abashed the Devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

Just the fact that this is even being considered should scare the hell out of everyone on this planet.

I would say the hand writing is on the wall - IN BIG LETTERS


10 posted on 05/09/2010 6:35:08 PM PDT by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
“Moderate” Muslims just want the Israelis to be run into the sea.
Radical Muslims was their throats cut first.
11 posted on 05/09/2010 6:38:30 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
Not while Israel has 250 to 750 nukes.

Yes, but once they have expended them, they have no more and then a final solution to the matter of the Jewish state can be had in accordance with Obama's vision. Regarding the destruction wrought by the use of that many nuclear weapons, well, Obama's plan realizes that there will be considerable collateral damage. But that is an acceptable price to him for finally resolving the problem of the Jewish state.

12 posted on 05/09/2010 6:39:13 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Related:

Obama’s dangerous initiative

New ‘nuke-free’ strategy blurs distinction between West, radical regimes

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3886103,00.html

“The new American strategy also blurs the distinction between the very possession of nukes and the nature of the governments holding them. The problem does not have to do with the weapons held by the US, Britain, France, India, or Israel. The main issue has to do with radical, authoritative and violent regimes such as Iran, which threatens to destroy Israel and turn all Mideastern regimes into radical Islamic ones.

A discussion of a nuke-free Middle East means exclusive preoccupation with Israel’s nuclear program. Iran won’t cease its effort to acquire nukes, and the preoccupation with Israel will merely serve Tehran’s aims by diverting some attention away from it. “


13 posted on 05/09/2010 6:39:42 PM PDT by SmartInsight (Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote. ~ G. J. Nathan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Does the term GTH 0 mean anything?


14 posted on 05/09/2010 6:41:13 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
The move, in a joint statement, reflected U.S. concern to win Arab backing for sanctions against Iran destruction of the State of Israel.
15 posted on 05/09/2010 6:41:29 PM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
FU BO
16 posted on 05/09/2010 6:41:48 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Destroy AMERICA.....Vote DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn; PhilDragoo

Time to be gearing up for “Bibi and the Jets”.


17 posted on 05/09/2010 6:42:04 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will rule your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Everyone knows that Israel doesn’t have the bomb.


18 posted on 05/09/2010 6:42:45 PM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

One thing is for sure,Mecca and Medina will be a not so fond memory.Tehran and Istanbul will get smoked too.


19 posted on 05/09/2010 6:43:09 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop thinking about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Yeah, good luck Barry. BTW, your forthcoming mideast peace negotiations headed by George The Mitchell, hero of Irish peace, they depend on trust. Think Israel trusts the face of America you present to the world? The sad part, the palestinians wouldn't trust you as far as they could spit either.

20 posted on 05/09/2010 6:43:18 PM PDT by SJackson (Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel and it must remain undivided, Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson