Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYCslicker

Since 25% of homosexuals (I dislike that they have hijacked the perfectly innocent word “gay” to describe themselves) already voted historically for R’s, no amount of placating them by pretending that they are not sexual deviants will garner any more votes.

You toss off the homosexual agenda as though it’s nothing. It is not a dumb political strategy to promote natural family and marriage and to condemn the homosexual agenda, it’s a suicidal political agenda to to the opposite.

No one is discouraging conservative thinking homosexuals (they are not “gay”), since already a certain percentage - apparently a goodly percentage - vote for R’s already.

What you’re promoting under the cloak of “practicality” is surrendering to the homosexual agenda. You condemn condemnation of homosexuality and that is hypocritical. You’re duplicitous and that is something I don’t cotton to.


121 posted on 05/09/2010 9:25:10 AM PDT by little jeremiah (http://lifewurx.com - Good herb formulas made by a friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

It’s not duplicitous.

It’s very straightfoward.

Don’t go out of your way to insult people that are willing to vote on your side, whatever their reasoning.

How much more direct and staightforward can I be?

“You toss off the homosexual agenda as though it’s nothing. It is not a dumb political strategy to promote natural family and marriage and to condemn the homosexual agenda, it’s a suicidal political agenda to to the opposite.”

I don’t toss off anything.

What is it do you not understand about the difference between A.) on the one hand condemning the homosexual agenda and promoting traditional families, and B.) on the other hand insulting and ridiculing homosexuals?

I’m not sure why you don’t understand the difference.

“No one is discouraging conservative thinking homosexuals . . . since already a certain percentage - apparently a goodly percentage - vote for R’s already.”

Discouraging is precisely what you are doing when you engage in personal attacks and ridicule.

In addition to discouraging those voters, you are reaffirming the insidious, disgusting, claim of the Left that they (the Left) are the best thing that’s ever happened to persecuted groups. And we both know that the Left does more in this country to perpetuate marginalization of persecuted groups than the Right could ever dream to do, because the Left has people on the right reaffirming and re-energizing the claim of intolerance who want to make personal attacks and ridicule rather than fighting the fight in the realm of ideas.

“What you’re promoting under the cloak of “practicality” is surrendering to the homosexual agenda. You condemn condemnation of homosexuality and that is hypocritical.”

That is not a true statement. Nowhere have I promoted surrendering to the homosexual agenda. No where did I condemn condemnation of homosexuality. What I condemned was personal attacks and ridicule. If you want to battle the homosexual agenda in a way that reflects credit on the conservative philosophy then I support you.


129 posted on 05/09/2010 9:41:01 AM PDT by NYCslicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson