Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sequoyah101
What about US vs Ark of 1898?

Open borders proponents have conflated the decision especially in the last decades. Ark's parents were legal residence of the US.

12 posted on 08/16/2015 1:32:04 PM PDT by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

EXACTLY what I was interpreting. Being legal makes him legal.


13 posted on 08/16/2015 1:36:08 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchaned our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

And, therefore, they were “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. As Mark Levin has repeatedly pointed out, the granting of birthright citizenship was only ruled upon favorably by ignoring the clause in the 14th Amendment which states: “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Illegals, having entered against the law, are not people who have subjected themselves to the jurisdiction of our laws.


14 posted on 08/16/2015 1:36:54 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson