the second one is obviously a photoshopped forgery and what the COLB’s from The Daily KOS, fight the smears and Factcheck SHOULD NOT MATCH in file size and detail unless of course they are FORGERIES.
Either I'm totally misunderstanding you, or that's the faultiest bit of logic I've ever read.
You are misunderstanding me on purpose.
It is a simple test to prove what qualities an original scan would have versus what qualities a photoshpped forgery would have.
So far you have shown me nothing that would indicate that you can render a simple scientific opinion via a simple test much less disprove Polarik’s exhaustive research, you couldn’t even do simple HTML code to link the site you wanted me to read.
As far as I am concerned you are incapable of rendering an opinion without buttressing it up with the works of others.
You are misunderstanding me on purpose.
It is a simple test to prove what qualities an original scan would have versus what qualities a photoshpped forgery would have.
So far you have shown me nothing that would indicate that you can render a simple scientific opinion via a simple test much less disprove Polarik’s exhaustive research, you couldn’t even do simple HTML code to link the site you wanted me to read.
As far as I am concerned you are incapable of rendering an opinion without buttressing it up with the works of others.
You are misunderstanding me on purpose.
It is a simple test to prove what qualities an original scan would have versus what qualities a photoshopped forgery would have.
So far you have shown me nothing that would indicate that you can render a simple scientific opinion via a simple test much less disprove Polarik’s exhaustive research, you couldn’t even do simple HTML code to link the site you wanted me to read.
As far as I am concerned you are incapable of rendering an opinion without buttressing it up with the works of others.