That link is two years old (2008) and has been proved wrong.
I have a simple test for you,
first using a laserjet printer create an Obama COLB and scan it and save it as a JPG.
Second using photoshop and a scan of a blank COLB create an Obama COLB and save it as a JPG
check each for file size as well as the artifacts or fuzzy white spots inside the letters
Then compare the file sizes and artifacts to the “original” Obama COLB’s created by The Daily KOS, fight the smears and Fact check first flattened copy and tell us your results.
to date no one that said that Obama’s COLB is the real thing has ever posted their results for this simple test.
Who proved it wrong. Would you provide a link to that proof, I'd like to look it over.
Then compare the file sizes and artifacts to the “original” Obama COLB’s created by The Daily KOS, fight the smears and Fact check first flattened copy and tell us your results.
What's your point?
to date no one that said that Obama’s COLB is the real thing has ever posted their results for this simple test.
Not knowing what you're getting at, and just off the top of my head, the test makes no sense - but I could be wrong.