That’s what concerns me, too. But here’s another layer - Cass Sunstein and the other regulatory ministers are in place. Do you think that they would decide that the cost-benefit ratio of canceling elections would not be worth it to them (never mind the inherent evilness of it), and that they would move their takeover efforts to the non-elective side of the balance sheet?
You know - it all looks normal from the voters’ point of view, but they continue to shove stuff through off the elective books?
Sunstein’s an architect, but the call to let the hammer drop won’t be his. The onlt cost-benefit anaylsis these monsters care about concerns who is left to rule from atop a heap of rubble and corpses.
A new feudalism (or worse) and a world lit only by fire will suit them just fine as long as they they think that they will be the ones in the high castle. Most of us dead. The rest of us in chains. That’s their cost-benefit analysis.
I believe that you are correct, and that much of this is going on already. I believe that it was well understood that one (or both) houses would be sure to lose the Democrat majority during this November's election cycle. (Not that anyone should expect any miraculous level of "corrective action" should (RINO) Republicans gain control. Elect enough Constitutional Conservatives, that is a different story!)
If anyone looks at the recent activity of any/all of the extra-Constitutional federal agencies (that have been created and expanded by both (R) and (D) administrations), you can see a beehive of activity focused on eliminating/diminishing our Liberties and Freedom, and ramping up the levels and force of tyranny. I refer to the FTC, FCC, EPA, etc. Much of the activity of these groups has been posted about here on FR (but sadly not many other places). These unaccountable bureaucrats in these agencies are working overtime to destroy this country. What is even worse in many cases, these entities have their own administrative judicial arms and courts that are defined to be the only relevant jurisdiction for grievances and appeals. What regime needs the Legislative and Judicial branches to continually toe the line when they can effectively rule by agency fiat?
None of this is new, been going on for far to long, but it looks like the pace is picking up rapidly. And for the most part, none of this activity is ever widely publicized until it is too late. At most, the state controlled media will make a brief mention of larger activity, and of course it is always spun in glowing terms describing how much better off we will all be once these "new rules" crack down on the {fill in the targeted villain}.