Skip to comments.
St. Paul, Minneapolis police chiefs oppose proposed immigration law
pioneer dePress ^
| 5-7-10
| ap
Posted on 05/07/2010 11:50:05 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
yeah. because so many of our violent crimes are solved thank largely to tips from our illegal immigrant community.(sarc)
FYI- both cities are run by metrocrats and are "sanctuary" cities...
To: WOBBLY BOB
This lib hysteria is just reverse profiling.
2
posted on
05/07/2010 11:51:04 AM PDT
by
junta
(S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
To: WOBBLY BOB
Illegal aliens are not immigrants, they are invaders.
3
posted on
05/07/2010 11:51:04 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
To: WOBBLY BOB
2 Pink Slips.. and show ‘em the door.
4
posted on
05/07/2010 11:51:51 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Chuck DeVore - CA Senator. Believe.)
To: WOBBLY BOB
The unions speaking through their “police chiefs”. The unions are counting on “amnesty” to get their numbers and union dues up.
5
posted on
05/07/2010 11:53:03 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Had enough "history" yet?)
To: WOBBLY BOB
**Arizona’s law would cause mistrust and have a “chilling effect” in immigrant communities.**
I think the authors of the bill were hoping for more of an “Emptying effect” (of the illegals)
6
posted on
05/07/2010 11:53:22 AM PDT
by
gwilhelm56
(The one thing we learn from history is .. People REFUSE to Learn from History!!)
To: WOBBLY BOB
Great news! If a sane President were in DC, Federal funding to ALL sanctuary cities would be stopped until they enforced immigration laws.
But, we have the Down-Low Marxist Muslim Messiah at the helm of the SS Titanic.
7
posted on
05/07/2010 11:53:23 AM PDT
by
wac3rd
(Prepare for the November 2010 Tsunami)
To: GeronL
The radical mexicans call it The Reconquista.
8
posted on
05/07/2010 11:54:22 AM PDT
by
Texas resident
(Outlaw fisherman)
To: WOBBLY BOB
It might have a “chilling effect” on possible “Democratic” voters, lawn care, kitchen help, maids, and cheap labor.
9
posted on
05/07/2010 11:55:06 AM PDT
by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
To: garyhope
But we’re always told our new immigrant friends are always the salt of the earth and violence-free...how is it they are always the ones police Chiefs here cite as the folks who are inexplicably linked to firsthand knowledge of crime and who is committing crime?
10
posted on
05/07/2010 11:55:21 AM PDT
by
WOBBLY BOB
("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
To: WOBBLY BOB
We would expect nothing less out of Minneapolis.
11
posted on
05/07/2010 11:55:45 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: WOBBLY BOB
We don’t want to do our jobs, let us write tickets and raise city revenue...
12
posted on
05/07/2010 11:56:49 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The hysteria of Matthewsism and Andersonism has led to a Tea Party Scare that is unAmerican.)
To: junta
Cops would rather profile white suburban commuters who won’t put up a physical fight or flee when pulled over for fines.
13
posted on
05/07/2010 11:57:33 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The hysteria of Matthewsism and Andersonism has led to a Tea Party Scare that is unAmerican.)
To: WOBBLY BOB
I was unaware that Minneapolous was located in Arizona. Man things change quickly with hope and change.
To: WOBBLY BOB
The police oppose it because if it passes, they might have to get off their doughnut eating a$$es and do some work. All those illegals mean a whole lot of extra paperwork, calling the INS, just a big bother...
15
posted on
05/07/2010 11:57:53 AM PDT
by
apillar
To: WOBBLY BOB
These police chiefs must resign or be sacked if they are unwilling to do the bidding of the people.
16
posted on
05/07/2010 11:58:36 AM PDT
by
Steelfish
(ui)
To: WOBBLY BOB
It's not their job to pick and choose which laws they'll enforce.
If they refuse, fire them.
17
posted on
05/07/2010 11:58:50 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Keep in mind the Chiefs of MPLS and St.Paul (not these same guys,but beholden to the same political whores)were also opposed to Minnesota getting “concealed carry” under the auspices that violent crime would increase and we’d have more ‘guns on the street’.
Wrong again , Big Chief BS’r.
18
posted on
05/07/2010 11:58:50 AM PDT
by
WOBBLY BOB
("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
To: a fool in paradise
It was pegged “Anarcho-Tyranny.”
19
posted on
05/07/2010 11:59:39 AM PDT
by
junta
(S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
To: WOBBLY BOB
It’s always the chiefs who are against it.
Wonder how the cop on the beat feels?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson