This has nothing to do with Islam, which we all know is a religion of peace.
Of course it had something to do with Islam, as that is what forms the basis for the "worldview" of a large group of people here in the United States ... whether they were born here or whether they came over and became citizens or if they are still on a limited time stay here.
Islam is a governmental worldview that requires its adherents to violently overthrow governments where they can, and if they cannot, then to do so in underhanded and subversive ways. The end goal is not "religion" -- but rather to install a "government" which goes by the guidelines from Islam.
So, what I'm saying is that even if he is a "success story" of some immigrant coming over here and making it good (at least for a while) -- if he is an adherent to Islam, something could happen at any time, even if he were never planning on doing something like that bombing -- to turn his thinking right back to his "foundational worldview" of Islam, in which it is supposed to be the supreme government over all the nations in the world. That's his thinking -- even if he is a success story.
That's the problem with all Muslims... and the only way you're going to solve that one is to get rid of all Muslims in this country ... :-)
I refuse to use sarcasm tags. I believe it insults my readers. However I did start the sentence with “This is what I do not believe.”
OK, we are not really very far apart. I understand your point now. I’m saying a significant portion of Muslims can’t be trusted. You’re saying no Muslim can be trusted. Like Siegfried and Roy and their tigers.