Posted on 05/06/2010 12:29:51 PM PDT by FightforFreedomCA
On to DC, Sarah! But first, stop Boxer.
While very important, I certainly hope that there are many other reasons for supporting Fiorina
“With RINO endorsements like this it tells me she is picking the sure RINOs annointed by the GOP alleged leaders.
They have palin on a short leash. He only flex is on races the GOP does not care about. “
W I N N E R
Birds of a feather flock together.
“Whats your desired path to citizenship Sarah? “
AMNESTY
Well who in the Hell do you like then? You are getting a bit nutcake boring.
Are you talking about the California Senate race? I don’t think Newt’s a candidate.
About Newt. He’s a has-been, RINO. Just check out who he’s endorsed the past two years and then go even further back see who he’s gotten into bed with. THe pic with Hillary says it all.
I think Palin is the only person to really energize the base, the women’s vote and bring the independents who are having voter’’s remorse, to win the WH in 2012. If not her then a relatively unknown like Bachman or Pence.
Whats your desired path to citizenship Sarah?
AMNESTY”
And that’s my biggest argument against her. If you’re for amnesty or the codeword “guestworker program”, don’t call yourself a conservative. Period. End of discussion.
Palin would get beat like a base drum. She would make Goldwater look like a landslide. FIND A CANDIDATE
AND in Arizona.
Another reason she is finished as a serious conservative spokesperson - and that may be a good thing.
Wanna bet a 6 pack of Shiner?
Check back late November 2012.
LOL...a little blast from the past:
"A Reagan nomination, and the crushing defeat likely to follow, could signal the end of our party as an effective force in American life."-- IL Senator Chuck Percy
I started to say that she might be saving her money until closer to the primary, but it is barely a month away now. That means that she hasn’t been able to raise enough money to compete and in politics, if you can’t raise money, you can’t play in the big boys’ game.
She is right. Politicians spend other people's money so freely that they probably can't make rational decisions about it. They are also better at posturing and pretending to be working than actually doing anything productive.
The problem is how the GOP “selects” potential candidates. I asked the local GOP president how they screened people who wanted to put an R beside their name on the ballot and he said that basically there was no screening process. That must change because we had a lifelong Rat who suddenly changed his party affiliation to the GOP and then murdered state senator Tommy Burke in an effort to run unopposed on the ticket.
I bumped into her (not literally) this March at the Reagan Library taping of the Sean Hannity show. Everything about her... the walk, the talk, air, and dress reminded me of Cruella Deville.
I’m seeing the same problem here in SC, in the race against incumbent “Glenn Beck is a fearmonger” Inglis. Jim Lee, AF vet, tea party guy, grass roots no PAC money, only non-lawyer/academia person running, and some folks want to get behind the lawyer-bureaucrat who has the most money and name recognition instead of supporting the guy best for the job.
I’ll make it clear when we get closer. It’s much too early to decide yet. Two years is a lifetime in politics. Who ever I chose will NOT be an inarticulate rino like your girl though. That much I am sure.
My, this has turned into quite the Palin hatefest. I am definitely disappointed in this decision, but not ready to throw her in the harbor. She’s still the most influential conservative out there and it will be interesting to see how things evolve as we move towards 2012.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.