Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Christian_Capitalist
Sorry, but I don't consider Augustine to be authoritative by any stretch. I go by what the Scriptures say, and what they say in this case is that the Temple would be defiled by a man calling himself God, not that the Temple would be destroyed.

Yeshua did prophesy that the Temple would be destroyed; of that there is no doubt. But by citing a well-known fulfilled prophecy that was very much on the Jewish heart of the Temple's defilement (and therefore, subsequent restoration), He was also looking beyond that to events leading up to His Parousia on the clouds of Heaven, where every eye will see Him.

Shalom.

76 posted on 05/06/2010 12:34:26 PM PDT by Buggman (HebrewRoot.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Buggman
Sorry, but I don't consider Augustine to be authoritative by any stretch. I go by what the Scriptures say, and what they say in this case is that the Temple would be defiled by a man calling himself God, not that the Temple would be destroyed.

No, Augustine's cross-reference of Daniel to Luke, which specifically refers to the desolation of Jerusalem, trumps your reference to 2 Thessalonians -- which has no such reference whatsoever.

I realize that Hal Lindsey teaches people to improperly associate 2 Thessalonians with the abomination of desolation reference in Daniel, but you really shouldn't. It's not what the Scripture says.

By contrast, the Augustinian cross-reference of Luke to Daniel is clear, consistent, and provably FULFILLED.

79 posted on 05/06/2010 4:53:24 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson