To: lapsus calami
Someone on FR called them Mouthpiece Media, I’ve been sticking with that. Yours is good too.
3 posted on
05/04/2010 5:47:19 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(http://lifewurx.com - Good herb formulas made by a friend)
To: little jeremiah
I heard Rush call them "Practically Pravda" last week. I thought that was appropriate.
7 posted on
05/04/2010 5:53:10 PM PDT by
stayathomemom
(Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
To: little jeremiah
Someone on FR called them Mouthpiece Media, I’ve been sticking with that. Yours is good too.I always had a fondness for the terms; "Presstitute" or "Pressholes".
9 posted on
05/04/2010 5:55:53 PM PDT by
central_va
( http://www.15thvirginia.org)
To: little jeremiah; Psycho_Bunny
Much too kind monikers for that pile of snakes, mine included. Actually, I have some rather robust descriptors for them though revealing those here would no doubt result in post-yanking followed by some quality time in the FR penalty box.
13 posted on
05/04/2010 6:18:36 PM PDT by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: little jeremiah
It's worse than that. At some point, someone is going to have to use the "c"-word: conspiracy.
You don't have news media accidentally leaning hard left (90% of them voted for McGovern in '72, remember, the year Nixon carried 49 states) for over 30 years, with an unbroken trend of increasing Left bias going back over 50 years (see Vance Packard, The Opinion Makers, 1965 I think it was), just by accident, luck of the draw, or "demographic tendencies".
It's people producing that out-of-kilter result, on purpose -- and that is the definition of a conspiracy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson