Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hoyer: Dems more successful at fighting terrorists than GOP
The Hill ^ | may 4 2010 | Jared Allen

Posted on 05/04/2010 12:33:38 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) on Tuesday said the Obama administration has been more successful in combating terrorism than its predecessor.

“We're tough on terrorists. That’s our policy. That’s our performance. And, in fact, we've been more successful,” Hoyer said at his weekly press availability.

Former President George W. Bush’s presidency was dominated by the issue of terrorism, and Bush’s vice president, Dick Cheney, has taken several shots at Democrats and President Barack Obama for endangering national security.

Hoyer’s remarks Tuesday appeared designed to counterattack Republicans looking to the attempted bombing Saturday in Times Square as evidence that Democrats are not doing enough to stop terrorists.

He took a direct shot at the Bush administration over Afghanistan, which he said had been ignored by the previous administration. He added that Democrats have been more successful in targeting terrorists where they come from.

“We've been more successful in Pakistan,” Hoyer said. "We're focused on where terrorism began — not began but was launched against us — in Afghanistan, which the Bush administration essentially ignored and, as a result, after seven years had a festering, worsening situation inherited by this administration.”

Hoyer also fought back against Republicans who’ve been critical of offering Miranda rights to terrorism suspects who are also U.S. citizens. He noted the Bush administration likewise issued Miranda rights to American citizens who were arrested.

The suspect arrested in the Times Square incident, Faisal Shahzad, was read his rights by U.S. authorities early Tuesday.

“I think it doesn't have a great deal of credibility, carping about that. Because, of course, that's the way Bush handled [it],” Hoyer said. “[Saying], 'It wasn't wrong when Bush did it but now it's wrong'? I don't think that sells.”

Hoyer said foiling terrorist attacks involves a degree of luck.

“I think every administration — the Bush administration, the Clinton administration — [has] tried to do what they could to preclude incidents from happening,” Hoyer said. “It is extraordinarily difficult.

“You've got to do everything you possibly can, and pray that you get also lucky,” he added. “Not because luck is what you want to rely on, but because, clearly, it is such a difficult challenge.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crushislam; democrats; faisalshahzad; islam; muslim; terrorists; unholyalliance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Presbyterian Reporter

The Times Square bombing was not thwarted! It failed.


21 posted on 05/04/2010 12:48:40 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Democrats are terrorist.


22 posted on 05/04/2010 12:49:52 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Free the last Navy Seal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

Elections are coming....

And we will be most happy to detail the terrorist attacks when Democrats are in charge.

Dukakis obliged us by posing in a tank.

Is there a comparable photo op showing Obama being weak on terrorism?

Is Obama bowing to Saudi king a good one?


23 posted on 05/04/2010 12:49:54 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

never mind the fact the only reason they “thwarted” the past two attempts is the fact the terrorists were as incompetent as emperor obama and his klan...


24 posted on 05/04/2010 12:52:41 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

The RATS got 3000+ killed on 9/11, while the Repubs haven’t even weighed in yet. Stuff it hoyer.


25 posted on 05/04/2010 1:07:52 PM PDT by Waco (Kalifonia don't need no stenkin oil and no stenkin revenues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco

Hoyer, just another blow hard Progressive. Screw him!

Look up the facts, O-hole!


26 posted on 05/04/2010 1:09:53 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (Please God, watch over our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

But wasn’t the messiah of hopenchange coming to be a balm on the foaming at the mouth moslem world, who were supposedly only angry by America’s warmongering Bush-cowboy behavior?

Wasn’t the whole point of obummer’s validity that the world would love us now and there would be peace and nirvana everlasting after warmongering Bush was gone and obummer — wink, wink, your brother, the moslem! — was installed???

Wouldn’t, shouldn’t, the world love us now that we have shown them how good and righteous we are by electing the stealth islamist!?

Wouldn’t obummer loose ever ity bity bit of legitimacy w/ every ity bity push and punch and attack of islamists???


27 posted on 05/04/2010 1:14:20 PM PDT by parisa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

“Takes one to know one”, seems to fit.


28 posted on 05/04/2010 1:36:29 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson