Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arec Barrwin

If this report has validity and it works, then do it.


2 posted on 05/04/2010 12:37:54 PM PDT by Riodacat (Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Riodacat
The Russians weren't doing this "offshore" one mile deep under the ocean,

As much difficulty as the folks are having manipulating relatively simple devices at that depth, I doubt many of us would feel all that comfortable with the same guys using nukes!

3 posted on 05/04/2010 12:39:33 PM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Riodacat

I’ve heard others say that the ocean floor in the Gulf, and particularly in this area, is so porous that a nuclear blast would only open more leaks.


5 posted on 05/04/2010 12:41:22 PM PDT by AnglePark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Riodacat

“If this report has validity and it works, then do it.”

The US has experience in underground nuclear explosions in gas wells too. Project Rulison and Gas Buggy in the 1970s.

They were attempts to fracture the rock in very low permeability formations in order to create improved flow channels tthorugh which gas can be produced.

The problem they found out was that the blast was so hot it melted all the rock surrounding the well and turned it essentially into glass. It was the reverse of what was intended.

So yes, you can probably stop the flow from the blowout.


18 posted on 05/04/2010 1:43:20 PM PDT by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson