Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tao Yin

It’s not entirely a lose-lose. At least with cashing out, I would get to keep some of my money for myself. With allowing confiscation, the government effectively owns all my money, and can use it to pay down debt, engage in corporate welfare, squander on the poor, women, and minorities (rich in Dem votes), or whatever. Or did you think they would actually keep the money for you eventual retirement???


154 posted on 05/04/2010 11:21:25 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (70 mph shouldn't be a speed limit; it shoud be a mandate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
All the government has to do is threaten and people many people will cash out. Those who cash out will pay higher taxes, sooner, with an added 10% penalty.

By pursuing this idea, they can get a huge infusion of cash without having to pass anything. They could even add a provision that forbids early withdrawal once the bill is passed. That would send people running for the exit and send cash streaming to Washington. Then they don't even need to bill to pass. Mission accomplished.

They might as well have an idea that anyone with over a million dollar in assets must immediately liquidate their 401k's and pay the early withdrawal penalty.

So I guess lose-lose is the wrong name; How about lose - lost? You lose if forced to withdraw early. Your money is lost if the government confiscates it.

169 posted on 05/04/2010 11:58:16 AM PDT by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson