Frankly though, I was asking that question of the troll, for the purpose of further illustrating his hypocrisy and inconsistency.
You are the troll here, slipping, sliding, attacking, evading.
All indications are that Rand Paul is the most pro-life candidate in the election, yet you are fighting on behalf of Trey Grayson.
Why is that? Are you going to man up and answer to anything related to your campaigning against Trey Grayson’s opponent?
Why is Trey Grayson the better choice for Kentucky voters?
Sorry I got a little heated. I have never felt much personal animosity toward Trey Grayson before I heard his pro-medicare commercial on Rush today. He is running like a Democrat using mediscare to pit Kentucky's grandparents against their grandchildren. I hate that!
I consider myself not merely prolife but prolific. We live in a world where other cultures are taking over the West. We are losing the demographic fight (i.e. the will to live and care about the future) and the number one reason that I hear from people about not having children or not having more children is that they can't afford them. Why not? The vicious circles of Social Security and Medicare that's a big reason why.
If you are concerned about out National Security, think about how hard it is to get many modern American parents to allow their only child (those that have at least one) to join the military and fight in a war. Ask any recruiter, in many cases it's d@mn near impossible. Parents used to be a recruiter's ally, not anymore. If not for the recession, the G.I. Bill (associated out of control education costs) and massive bonuses, our military would be bankrupt for men.