[EternalVigilance]

I note that as usual not a single defender of the pro-choice for states position can or will name any other unalienable right that they are willing to apply their illogic to other than the right to life.

Which isn’t surprising, since the very question lays bare the preposterous nature of their arguments. They will not answer because they cannot answer.

We’re either ALL equally entitled our God-given unalienable rights or we’re not. And if we as a people have decided that we’re not, this republic is truly dead. The dynamite charges have been set all around the foundations, and the entire edifice WILL fall.

[Christian_Capitalist]

I note that as usual not a single defender of the pro-choice for states position can or will name any other unalienable right that they are willing to apply their illogic to other than the right to life.

You're lying. I have addressed this argument with you HEAD-ON.

It is YOU who will not answer MY questions about this very point.

So, let's try it again:

I repeat: If a State Legislature DOES abolish its Laws against some form of Civil Harm (Rape, or Abortion, or what have you), what precisely is the Federal Government supposed to DO about it, according to the Constitution?

Please answer the question.

.... Just so we're clear: are you saying that if any State does legalize Abortion (or Rape, or some other Civil Harm against the citizenry), that the President should launch a punitive military assault upon that State? If that's what you're saying, then just say it.

Well? Any answer?
Or do you want to ping "ALL" lurkers to your own unwillingness to address my questions?