Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ariz.'s largest paper: Pols failed on immigration
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/2/10 | AP

Posted on 05/02/2010 4:40:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

PHOENIX – Arizona's largest newspaper criticized U.S. Sens. John McCain and Jon Kyl and a host of other elected officials in a rare front-page editorial Sunday, saying the politicians have failed to find solutions to illegal immigration.

The state has become the target of calls for boycotts since adopting a law that requires local and state law enforcement officers to question people about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the country illegally.

"The federal government is abdicating its duty on the border. Arizona politicians are pandering to public fear," The Arizona Republic said in a full-page editorial. "The result is a state law that intimidates Latinos while doing nothing to curb illegal immigration."

Doug MacEachern, an editorial writer for the Republic, said the newspaper has put editorials on the front page over the years but this was the first time one filled the front page.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizona; failed; illegalimmigration; immigration; pols
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 05/02/2010 4:40:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

we need a billboard here in AZ:

“Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results- McCain had 4 tries!!”

Who wants to help me fund and raise this?


2 posted on 05/02/2010 4:45:03 PM PDT by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Arizona Republic is just their sister paper, “La Voz”, repackaged. It’s everyone’s fault but those who break the law.


3 posted on 05/02/2010 4:47:48 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So, the feds (Border Patrol, ICE) can ask a person for his papers, but an AZ leo can’t cuz its profiling?

We ain’t got a chance.


4 posted on 05/02/2010 4:48:21 PM PDT by umgud (Obama is a failed experiment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"The federal government is abdicating its duty on the border."

There's the core issue...dereliction of duty by the federal government...and in violation of their oaths of office. There should be impeachments, but with the party of corruption in power that'll never happen.

5 posted on 05/02/2010 4:54:37 PM PDT by highlander_UW (First we take down the Democrats, then we clean the Augean stable that is the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Fun with Logic:
“The result is:
1. a state law that intimidates Latinos.
As a gun-carrying American, I’m not intimidated if stopped for concealed carry because I have a carry permit. Legal Arizonans have no reason to feel intimidated either, while illegal aliens should fear the law.

2. while doing nothing to curb illegal immigration.”
If this new law does nothing to curb illegal immigration, then illegal latinos have nothing to fear either.

You gotta give it a chance to work, gerbilists.


6 posted on 05/02/2010 4:55:37 PM PDT by tumblindice (So, when does Sean Penn begin polishing pelicans?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results - McCain had 4 tries!!"

I believe that's the AA definition of insanity ... not the real one.

Epic fail ... back to the 12 steps for you.

7 posted on 05/02/2010 4:59:23 PM PDT by ~Peter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The federal govt broke the contract, so the states are free to do as they will to protect against invasion.

Article 4 section 4: look it up. The fedgov is charged with protecting the states from invasion. They have refused to do so. The contract is off, at least as far as Article 4 Section 4 goes.

8 posted on 05/02/2010 5:04:22 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

AZVotes


9 posted on 05/02/2010 5:05:53 PM PDT by FrankR (Standing up against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future will belong to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I just read the summary of the editorial, so tell me:

Was one Latino “leader” named as a culprit? Or just the good white folks?

Any call outs of racism committed by the Latinos and their liberal counterparts? After all they really are all about race, now aren’t they?

Was the media at all blamed for decades of pandering to minorities?


10 posted on 05/02/2010 5:08:02 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Does anybody actually believe a newspaper editorial anymore?

They defend a clown-president who hides his records and associates with equally idiotic figures who’s main achievements are never having real jobs and bombing the pentagon.

Meanwhile, journalism grads accuse the rest of us of being “uneducated”.

What a bunch of bull-Obama.

Obama, the Kenyan name for “couldn’t figure out how to use a screwdriver”.


11 posted on 05/02/2010 5:29:23 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

The editorial blames just about all local politicians - the Governor (Brewer) and McCain for political opportunism, liberal Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon for his “shrill” denunciation of the law, Napolitano for “amnesia” for forgetting the arguments she made as governor once she got to Washington (she used to blame the Feds for not doing anything); and Representative Grijalva - “For a congressman to call for destruction of his own state’s economy is irresponsible and beneath contempt.”

Overall, the editorial is weak and predictable, although there are a few nice shots at the left and McCain (redundant?). There are also unfair shots at various state conservatives.

Here’s why this editorial fails: one of the biggest culprits in this firestorm is this very paper, the Arizona Republic. As soon as the law passed, it ran an editorial that contained false info about the statue:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/2010/04/22/20100422thur2-22.html
Mayor Gordon got on various national programs and echoed the falsehoods, and we were off to the races.


12 posted on 05/02/2010 5:47:17 PM PDT by lawdvd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

LOL!!

...Obama, the Kenyan name for “couldn’t figure out how to use a screwdriver”.

great.


13 posted on 05/02/2010 5:51:12 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The fool Katrina Van Den Heuval stated on This Week that the crime rate in Az. has gone down in recent years, so they don’t need to have it. I think Napolitano said the same thing on a different show.


14 posted on 05/02/2010 5:52:40 PM PDT by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud; P-Marlowe

If there’s a law requiring visitors to carry their papers for presentation when asked by authorities, and there is such a law:

1. What part of the law says that only federal authorities are the only authorities permitted to ask?

2. What part of the law says that non-enforcement by the feds is the way the law must be treated if the feds decide to ignore enforcement of a legitimate law.


15 posted on 05/02/2010 6:13:29 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

One of the most clearly defined duties apportioned to the Federal Government under the Constitution is National Defense.
National Defense included border controls and immigration.

We cannot let people pick which laws they want to follow or ignore or the result is anarchy. The Federal government is failing on one of it’s most clearly defined obligations, which is order control as a part of national defense.

If our Fed government won’t do the job, then who has the responsibility to protect it’s citizens? Each State has a Constitution that makes it a sovereign entity. And each state has it’s own law enforcement agencies, and Militia to carry out those responsibilities.

Illegal immigration is and will always be a violation of law. No matter what people complain about, there is nothing racist about law enforcement.


16 posted on 05/02/2010 6:27:33 PM PDT by o_zarkman44 (Obama is the ultimate LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

“Does anybody actually believe a newspaper editorial anymore?”

I won’t even read that section of the paper. It makes my blood pressure rise. I toss it into the discard pile without even looking at it.


17 posted on 05/02/2010 6:36:16 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

we need a billboard here in AZ
**************
We sure do, we also NEED JD Hayworth in AZ

http://www.jdforsenate.com/


18 posted on 05/02/2010 6:59:39 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The problems facing Arizona are not the Arizonans’ doing. They are the result of a cowardly and politically pandering Federal government, idiot leftists who offer illegals “sanctuary” in violation of Federal law (nullification?), and indifferent liberal judges who impose the responsibility of caring for the illegals on the States.


19 posted on 05/02/2010 7:00:13 PM PDT by popdonnelly (The enormous crimes in history were all perpetrated by governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Article 4 section 4: look it up. The fedgov is charged with protecting the states from invasion. They have refused to do so. The contract is off, at least as far as Article 4 Section 4 goes.

It was one of the beeves cited by Texas in her secession declaration. No Congressional appropriations for frontier and border security -- the Yankee congresscritters wouldn't appropriate when it was Texas's neck.

But, of course "it was all about slavery", so I must be lying as usual, again. What a racist.

</s>

20 posted on 05/02/2010 7:49:29 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson