[jamese777]

But Indiana is not the US Supreme Court, and as I stated, the Supreme Court has already established that the definition in the law of Nations was the intended, and only possible definition.

---

American general elections are conducted on a state by state basis. If Indiana had invalidated Obama’s electoral college votes, it is highly likely that other states would have done the same thing, like dominos falling.

Even with a conservative majority, the current US Supreme Court has shown no interest in ruling on this issue, having already rejected hearing any of seven different Obama eligibility appeals: Berg v Obama, Craig v US et al., Donofrio v Wells, Herbert v Obama, Lightfoot v Bowen, Schneller v Cortes and Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz.
There is one more appeal pending on the Supreme Court’s 2010 “cert conference” docket: Beverly v FEC.

[editor-surveyor]

“American general elections are conducted on a state by state basis. If Indiana had invalidated Obama’s electoral college votes, it is highly likely that other states would have done the same thing, like dominos falling.”

I agree.

There have been hundreds of failures to follow the law, leading up to Obama pretending to be president. It is that failing specifically that has made him more disastrous than McCain would have been.