Subtitle: Did The Republican Party Purposely Allow An Ineligible Candidate To Run For President In 2008? Interesting explanation for why our leaders are trying not to see the emperor's new clothes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Menehune56
That theory is pure BS
Good Lord we are not that stupid
2 posted on
05/02/2010 10:09:07 AM PDT by
RWGinger
To: Menehune56
because it is stupid, started by democrat berg who is a nut, does not benefit politically....etc....etc.... etc....
4 posted on
05/02/2010 10:14:38 AM PDT by
GoMonster
(GO)
To: Menehune56
Riiiiiight. The eligibility of John McCain, born to his mother (a U.S. natural born citizen) while his father (a U.S. natural born citizen) was serving in the U.S. military, was in doubt. Riiiiight.
5 posted on
05/02/2010 10:16:22 AM PDT by
PackerBoy
(Just my opinion ....)
To: Menehune56
6 posted on
05/02/2010 10:18:57 AM PDT by
MizSterious
("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
To: Menehune56
There is NO QUESTION that John McCain meets the Constitutional requirements.
None at all!
8 posted on
05/02/2010 10:28:23 AM PDT by
Kansas58
To: Menehune56
But it was well-documented at the time, and additional documentation and analysis have established, that John McCains eligibility was in question as well. With that being the case, why would the Republicans nominate a candidate who might not be constitutionally eligible to serve in the office? They nominated him, because they knew those questioning his eligibility were wrong.
9 posted on
05/02/2010 10:34:20 AM PDT by
Kleon
To: Menehune56
a leading candidate for 2012???? Really ? McCain ? Why not wait until he's ten years older ?
10 posted on
05/02/2010 10:38:15 AM PDT by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: Menehune56
Was the Republican Party aware of John McCains potential eligibility issue? Of course it was. The issue was written about by major news organizations The New York Times, The Washington Post. They wrote about it in 1998. They again wrote about it in 2008. In February of 2008 the Panama issue was written about by these and other major news outlets. And unlike the mocking and sarcastic tone used when writing about Obamas eligibility issues, these articles are written in serious journalistic fashion and raise the possibility of a constitutional crisis should McCain be elected.-PJ
12 posted on
05/02/2010 10:47:06 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
To: Menehune56
Because they’re not that stupid and it’s a moot point anyway.
16 posted on
05/02/2010 11:00:49 AM PDT by
dr_who
To: Menehune56
100 years ago, we all pitied the village idiot
50 years ago, we quoted him in newspapers anxious for more circulation
20 years ago we put his sound bites on TV
Now, he has a keyboard and website.
(And 18 months ago, we elected him Prezidet.)
19 posted on
05/02/2010 11:05:34 AM PDT by
MindBender26
(Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
To: Menehune56
Fact is the Republicans still have hopes of getting the black vote,even though it is provent they never will get it. They remain quiet for just that reason, they dont want to appear as racist.They dont want the media coming down on them with both feet in a fight over Obama’s legitimacy, because win or lose the country doesnt need the race riots it would cause.
22 posted on
05/02/2010 11:10:04 AM PDT by
Venturer
To: Menehune56
Obama and his puppet masters were behind the “McCain’s not a citizen” discussion.
AND NO ONE ANYWHERE OTHER THAN SOME ‘WE THE PEOPLES’ TOOK A LOOK AT OBAMA’S “ELIGIBILITY.” The Republicans REFUSED to do their duty.
The Senate NEVER SHOULD HAVE ALLOWED Obama to be seated in their assembly without verifying his eligibility.
BLAME IT ON REPUBLICANS IN THE SENATE FOR BEING STOOGES.
23 posted on
05/02/2010 11:12:27 AM PDT by
HighlyOpinionated
(SPEAK UP REPUBLICANS, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU YET! IMPEACH OBAMA!)
To: Menehune56
I thought it was due to cowardice, stupidity and failure.
25 posted on
05/02/2010 11:14:16 AM PDT by
Manic_Episode
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
To: Menehune56
29 posted on
05/02/2010 11:32:31 AM PDT by
SweetCaroline
(He is the Antichrist that denieth the Father and the Son. 1-John 2:22)
To: Menehune56
It’s the “go along to get along” syndrome.
Trust, but verify!
And that goes double for Dems and RINO’s!
33 posted on
05/02/2010 11:44:02 AM PDT by
airborne
("It's a great day for hockey!" - 'Badger' Bob Johnson (RIP))
To: Menehune56
This is pure unadulterated poppycock!
“the 2008 race was going to the Democrats and the Republicans did not want a leading candidate for 2012 to lose or be roughed up during the campaign.”
Republicans don’t plan that well, but by the law of unintended consequences they managed to get Sarah Palin destroyed for 2012. Most of the time stuff just happens.
34 posted on
05/02/2010 11:47:08 AM PDT by
Keflavik76
(It's an Obama Nation, pray for America.)
To: LucyT
Be ready for a SP attack!!!
40 posted on
05/02/2010 12:20:45 PM PDT by
danamco
(")
To: Menehune56
The Republicans didn't press Obama on his eligibility because it would have been very damaging politically and possibly to physical property and life.
The liberals and leftists have made racism and any hint of racism so damaging and radioactive that any direct, damaging attack on Barack Obama would either have been political suicide and/or the beginning of 1960's style race riots.
Since a growing majority of Americans are blissfully ignorant of Constitutional principles, this threat was all the more real as such an attack would have seemed unwarranted and fueled by bigotry only.
On the other hand, many patriotic Americans would have endured those things not to have elected a usurper.
But, if the Republicans lost too many seats, then the possibility of stopping the Democrat Party became only a remote possibility for the foreseeable future.
41 posted on
05/02/2010 12:22:36 PM PDT by
TheThinker
(Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
To: Menehune56
Republicans didn’t bring it up because they are first rate spineless wimps, frightened to death of being accused of raaaaacism. Much easier and safer to hide under your desk...like Mitchie the kid McConnell.
To: Menehune56
That article is bs pure and simple. McCain had no support and was on his way home supposedly; only the public didn’t know the democrats and I am assuming Republicans had already set the wheels in motion for a selected election.
Why do they keep lying to us?
44 posted on
05/02/2010 12:37:54 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson