“people who think statute law governs the birth status of the natural born.”
Speaking for myself, I think the common law of England in the 1700s IS relevant to what the Framers intended. Original intent needs to be found somewhere, and I don’t think one sentence in Vittel suffices.
“You purport to agree with the so-called “birther” definition of NBC, and yet you attack it at every turn. Explain yourself.”
I have, on multiple threads including this one. See post 313 on this thread.
Absolutely. That's exactly why my position is that we need a SCOTUS ruling.