I would assume that, should we win the U.S. House in 2010,
one option would be to start a House Committee Investigation into the entire issue and subpoena his BC from Hawaii.
Would one of our Freeper lawyers on line, care to give a legal opinion regarding this option?
All of you who still concentrate on proving Barack Obama is Constitutionally eligible for the Presidency miss the point. No law requires the Electors to elect only a Constitutionally eligible President. Indeed, several states have enacted laws requiring Electors to vote for the party nominee. (No “faithless Elector” has ever been prosecuted.) (These laws demonstrate, citizens CAN enact laws telling the (party chosen) Electors to vet for Constitutional eligibility.) However, laws in several states require only eligible candidates can have their names printed on the ballot. The real question is, on what documentary basis did members of the D party - Nancy Pelosi, Alice Germond, Boyd Richie, or Kathy Hensley (SC D party state Treasurer) - Certify to state election officials candidate Obama was Constitutionally qualified for the job, to get those officials to print his name on the ballot? These are the people the state should be pursuing. That’s why we filed citizen complaints of election fraud against these D’s with state A’sG in applicable states. http://jbjd.wordpress.com